ArticleBMJ open2019
Supporting children and young people when making decisions about joining clinical trials: qualitative study to inform multimedia website development.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Experiences and perspectives of children and adolescents participating in pediatric clinical trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Providing multimedia information to children and young people increases recruitment to trials: pre-planned meta-analysis of SWATs.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2022Trial
- Evaluating the use of multimedia information when recruiting adolescents to orthodontics research: A randomised controlled trial.Journal of orthodontics · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Using a Respectful Approach to Child-centred Healthcare (ReACH) in a paediatric clinical trial: A feasibility study.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Evaluation of an Interactive, Educational Website Developed for Adolescents to Learn About Pediatric Clinical Trials: DigiKnowIt News.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersTrial
- Article
- Engaging children, young people, parents and health professionals in interviews: Using an interactive ranking exercise within the co-design of multimedia websites.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024Article
- Psychological Disorders of Patients With Allergic Rhinitis in Chengdu, China: Exploratory Research.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- An online survey to assess parents' preferences for learning about child health research.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.Trials · 2020Review
- SWATted away: the challenging experience of setting up a programme of SWATs in paediatric trials.Trials · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo understand stakeholders' views regarding the content and design of paediatric clinical trial multimedia websites. To describe how this knowledge informed the development of the multimedia websites.
designQualitative study comprising two rounds of interviews or focus groups, with thematic analysis of interview transcripts.
participantsSixty-two people (21 children and young people with long-term health conditions, 24 parents and 17 professionals).
settingOne UK children's hospital and one UK Young Persons' Advisory Group.
resultsWhen asked what was important in deciding whether to join a trial, children, young people and parents prioritised information about what participation would involve, what the trial was testing, potential benefits and risks of participation and knowing they could leave the trial if they later changed their minds. Young people and parents trusted trial teams to follow regulatory and quality requirements and therefore did not think such information was a priority for the websites, although logos of trusted organisations could lend credibility. Professionals largely concurred with these views. Children and young people advised on the importance of designing the multimedia website to ensure its appearance, tone and wording suited the intended audience and on using animated characters to facilitate children's engagement.
conclusionsOur study provides insights into the information that families value when deciding about healthcare trial participation. It provides guidance on the design of information resources to appeal to children and young people, while also being acceptable to parents and professionals who are often gatekeepers of children's access to information. Our findings will be of use to others developing similar multimedia websites. We report specific information needs and new visual preferences that are not usually addressed in printed trial information. Our work illustrates what qualitative research and participatory design practices can contribute to the development of information resources more generally. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN73136092; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.