Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782720›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Supporting children and young people when making decisions about joining clinical trials: qualitative study to inform multimedia website development.

Jacqueline M Martin-Kerry, Peter Knapp, Karl Atkin, Peter Bower, Ian Watt, Catherine Stones, Steven Higgins, Rebecca Sheridan, Jenny Preston, Danielle Horton Taylor and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Evaluation of an Interactive, Educational Website Developed for Adolescents to Learn About Pediatric Clinical Trials: DigiKnowIt News.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jacqueline M Martin-KerryDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9299-1360
Peter KnappDepartment of Health Sciences & Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5904-8699
Karl AtkinDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ian WattDepartment of Health Sciences & Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Catherine StonesSchool of Design, Clothworkers' Central, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Steven HigginsSchool of Education, University of Durham, Durham, UK.
Rebecca SheridanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Jenny PrestonUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Danielle Horton TaylorPatient and Public Involvement member, London, UK.
Paul BainesPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Bridget YoungDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/21/21Medical Research Council MR/L004933/1Medical Research Council MR/L004933/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand stakeholders' views regarding the content and design of paediatric clinical trial multimedia websites. To describe how this knowledge informed the development of the multimedia websites.

designQualitative study comprising two rounds of interviews or focus groups, with thematic analysis of interview transcripts.

participantsSixty-two people (21 children and young people with long-term health conditions, 24 parents and 17 professionals).

settingOne UK children's hospital and one UK Young Persons' Advisory Group.

resultsWhen asked what was important in deciding whether to join a trial, children, young people and parents prioritised information about what participation would involve, what the trial was testing, potential benefits and risks of participation and knowing they could leave the trial if they later changed their minds. Young people and parents trusted trial teams to follow regulatory and quality requirements and therefore did not think such information was a priority for the websites, although logos of trusted organisations could lend credibility. Professionals largely concurred with these views. Children and young people advised on the importance of designing the multimedia website to ensure its appearance, tone and wording suited the intended audience and on using animated characters to facilitate children's engagement.

conclusionsOur study provides insights into the information that families value when deciding about healthcare trial participation. It provides guidance on the design of information resources to appeal to children and young people, while also being acceptable to parents and professionals who are often gatekeepers of children's access to information. Our findings will be of use to others developing similar multimedia websites. We report specific information needs and new visual preferences that are not usually addressed in printed trial information. Our work illustrates what qualitative research and participatory design practices can contribute to the development of information resources more generally. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN73136092; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHealth PersonnelInternetMultimediaParentsPatient ParticipationAdolescentChildDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchYoung Adultadolescentschildrenclinical trialsinformed consentmultimedia informationparticipatory designqualitative researchwebsitesyoung people

Identifiers

PMID30782720
PMCPMC6340013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.