Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782701›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Children with Hemiparesis Arm and Movement Project (CHAMP): protocol for a multisite comparative efficacy trial of paediatric constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) testing effects of dosage and type of constraint for children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Sharon Landesman Ramey, Stephanie DeLuca, Richard D Stevenson, Jane Case-Smith, Amy Darragh, Mark Conaway

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01895660 phase2completednot on this map

A Multisite Trial of Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled124ConditionsHemiparesis, Cerebral Palsy, Brain InjuryArmsVariations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation
NCT04816175 nacompletednot on this map

Intensive Therapy for Children With Microcephaly, Hyperkinetic Movements, or Global Developmental Delay

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled4ConditionsMicrocephaly, Hyperkinesis With Developmental Delay, Global Developmental DelayArmsAcquire Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharon Landesman RameyVirginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
Stephanie DeLucaVirginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
Richard D StevensonUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jane Case-SmithOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Amy DarraghOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Mark ConawayUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

Multi-site RCT of Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)R01HD068345 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DELUCA, STEPHANIE C., RAMEY, SHARON LANDESMAN · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Children with Hemiparesis Arm and Movement Project (CHAMP) addresses two pressing issues concerning paediatric constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT): effects of two dosages and two types of constraint on functional outcomes. Systematic reviews conclude that CIMT is one of the most efficacious treatments, but wide variations in treatment protocols, outcome measures and patient characteristics have prevented conclusions about potential effects of dosage levels and constraint methods. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CHAMP is a multisite comparative efficacy randomised controlled trial of 135 children (2-8 years) with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. The 2×2 factorial design tests two dosage levels-60 hours (3.0 hours/day, 5 days/week × 4 weeks) and 30 hours (2.5 hours/day, 3 days/week × 4 weeks) and two constraint conditions-full-arm, full-time cast and part-time splint, plus usual and customary (UCT) controls, yielding five groups: (1) 60 hours CIMT+full-time cast, (2) 60 hours CIMT+part-time splint, (3) 30 hours CIMT+full-time cast, (4) 30 hours CIMT+part-time splint and (5) UCT. Trained therapists deliver the standardised ACQUIREc protocol for CIMT. Blinded assessments at baseline, end of treatment, and 6 and 12 months post treatment include the Assisting Hand Assessment, and subscales from the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 and modified Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Parents complete the Pediatric Motor Activity Log and Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. A new Fidelity of Implementation Rehabilitation Measure monitors treatment delivery. Data analyses involve repeated-measures multivariate analysis of co-variance controlling for selected baseline variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics boards at site universities approved the study protocol. To promote equipoise, parents of UCT controls are offered ACQUIREc after 6 months. A Data Safety and Monitoring Committee reviews results regularly, including measures of child and family stress. We will disseminate CHAMP results via peer-reviewed publications and presentations to professional and advocacy organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01895660; Pre-results.

Indexed as

ArmCerebral PalsyChildChild, PreschoolExercise Movement TechniquesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicParesisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment Outcomecerebral palsycimtcomparative effectiveness trialhemiparesishigh intensity treatmentpediatric constraint-induced movement therapy

Identifiers

PMID30782701
PMCPMC6340418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.