Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782678›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Realist evaluation of the role of the Universal Health Coverage Partnership in strengthening policy dialogue for health planning and financing: a protocol.

Emilie Robert, Valery Ridde, Dheepa Rajan, Omar Sam, Mamadou Dravé, Denis Porignon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An ethical analysis of policy dialogues.Health research policy and systems · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emilie RobertTraining and Research Transcultural Team, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Valery RiddeCentre Population et Développement, Paris, Île-de-France, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-8266
Dheepa RajanDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Omar SamInter-Country Support Team, World Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Mamadou DravéCountry Office, World Health Organization, Lomé, Togo.
Denis PorignonDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Department of HealthWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2011, WHO, the European Union and Luxembourg entered into a collaborative agreement to support policy dialogue for health planning and financing; these were acknowledged as core areas in need of targeted support in countries' quest towards universal health coverage (UHC). Entitled 'Universal Health Coverage Partnership', this intervention is intended to strengthen countries' capacity to develop, negotiate, implement, monitor and evaluate robust and integrated national health policies oriented towards UHC. It is a complex intervention involving a multitude of actors working on a significant number of remarkably diverse activities in different countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The researchers will conduct a realist evaluation to answer the following question: How, in what contexts, and triggering what mechanisms, does the Partnership support policy dialogue for health planning and financing towards UHC? A qualitative multiple case study will be undertaken in Togo, Liberia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Cape Verde, Burkina Faso and Niger. Three steps will be implemented: (1) formulating context-mechanism-outcome explanatory propositions to guide data collection, based on expert knowledge and theoretical literature; (2) collecting empirical data through semistructured interviews with key informants and observations of key events, and analysing data; (3) specifying the intervention theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The primary target audiences are WHO and its partner countries; international and national stakeholders involved in or supporting policy dialogues in the health sector, especially in low-income countries; and researchers with interest in UHC, policy dialogue, evaluation research and/or realist evaluation.

Indexed as

Health PolicyBurkina FasoCabo VerdeDemocratic Republic of the CongoGovernment ProgramsHealth Care ReformHealth PlanningHumansInterinstitutional RelationsLiberiaLuxembourgNigerPolicy MakingResearch DesignTogoUniversal Health Insurancehealth financinghealth planningpolicy dialoguerealist evaluationuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID30782678
PMCPMC6340476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.