Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019
Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06419946 (Phase III Trial of Temozolomide/Lomustine), which is not on this map. Cited by 343 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase III Trial of Temozolomide/Lomustine (TMZ/LOM) Combination Therapy vs. Standard TMZ Therapy for Newly Diagnosed MGMT Promoter Methylated Glioblastoma (IDHwt) Patients +/- Tumor Treating Fields (Optune)
Who cites it
343 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 568 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary treatment is necessary in glioblastoma with extracerebral metastases.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Pooled it
- Cerebellar glioblastoma in adults: a comparative single-center matched pair analysis and systematic review of the literature.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Pertinence of glioma and single nucleotide polymorphism of TERT, CCDC26, CDKN2A/B and RTEL1 genes in glioma: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Patterns, predictors and prognostic relevance of high-grade hematotoxicity after temozolomide or temozolomide-lomustine in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Trial
- Prognostic impact of obesity in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of CeTeG/NOA-09 and GLARIUS.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Trial
- Improvement of functional outcome for patients with newly diagnosed grade 2 or 3 gliomas with co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL: the NOA-18 trial.BMC cancer · 2022Trial
- High levels of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite with protein nitration: a new therapeutic target for gliomas.Medical gas research · 2027Review
- Pathway dysregulation and therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma: molecular mechanisms and emerging therapeutic targets.Future science OA · 2026Review
- MGMT promoter methylation as a molecular biomarker in neuro-oncology: current practices, challenges, and future directions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of methodology, reporting and transparency of 50 highly cited randomised trials in neurology: a cross-sectional analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Methyl 4-O-Demethylbarbatate Destabilises HIF-1α and Enhances Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioma Cells.Cell proliferation · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of blood group O in MGMT-methylated glioblastoma patients receiving radiochemotherapy with temozolomide and lomustine.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Anatomical-molecular interaction in glioblastoma: subventricular zone involvement and MGMT-related survival benefit.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- The evolution of RTOG and NRG Oncology CNS tumors clinical trials.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-guided discovery of fungal ergosterol derivatives as selective LXRβ agonists targeting the cholesterol dependency of glioblastoma.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Evolving landscape of glioblastoma research : A 75-year bibliometric study on survival, treatment and gender in authorship.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Natural and Synthetic Compounds, Swords for Glioblastoma Therapy: From Tumor to Its Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Construction Strategies, Microenvironmental Modelling and Precision-Therapy Applications of Glioma Organoid Models.Cancers · 2026Review
283 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
49 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an urgent need for more effective therapies for glioblastoma. Data from a previous unrandomised phase 2 trial suggested that lomustine-temozolomide plus radiotherapy might be superior to temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylation of the MGMT promoter. In the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, we aimed to further investigate the effect of lomustine-temozolomide therapy in the setting of a randomised phase 3 trial.
methodsIn this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients from 17 German university hospitals who were aged 18-70 years, with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter, and a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70% and higher. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a predefined SAS-generated randomisation list to standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (75 mg/m
findingsBetween June 17, 2011, and April 8, 2014, 141 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups; 129 patients (63 in the temozolomide and 66 in the lomustine-temozolomide group) constituted the modified intention-to-treat population. Median overall survival was improved from 31·4 months (95% CI 27·7-47·1) with temozolomide to 48·1 months (32·6 months-not assessable) with lomustine-temozolomide (hazard ratio [HR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0492 for log-rank analysis). A significant overall survival difference between groups was also found in a secondary analysis of the intention-to-treat population (n=141, HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0432 for log-rank analysis). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 32 (51%) of 63 patients in the temozolomide group and 39 (59%) of 66 patients in the lomustine-temozolomide group. There were no treatment-related deaths.
interpretationOur results suggest that lomustine-temozolomide chemotherapy might improve survival compared with temozolomide standard therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter. The findings should be interpreted with caution, owing to the small size of the trial.
fundingGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.