Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782158›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Improved performance of district health systems through implementing health center clinical and administrative standards in the Amhara region of Ethiopia.

Mesele Damte Argaw, Binyam Fekadu Desta, Temesgen Ayehu Bele, Abebe Dagnew Ayne

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Health Care Financing Systems and Their Effectiveness: An Empirical Study of OECD Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mesele Damte ArgawUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. in Ethiopia, P. O. Box 1392, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. mdamte5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-6619
Binyam Fekadu DestaUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. in Ethiopia, P. O. Box 1392, 1110, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Temesgen Ayehu BeleFederal Ministry of Health, Health Extension and Primary Health Services Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abebe Dagnew AyneAmhara Regional State Health Bureau, Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Core Process, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-663-A-17-00002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandards represent benchmarks against which improvements can be measured. In 2016, the Federal Ministry of Health developed and endorsed a set of standards entitled the Ethiopian Health Center Reform Implementation Guidelines (EHCRIGs). This study aims to assess the effects of planned interventions on performance and quality of services in primary health care units (PHCUs).

methodsA quasi-experimental pre-post study design was used to compare the performance of PHCUs against the ECHRIG standards before and after its implementation in 76 woredas of the Amhara region from July - December 2017. Pre and post-intervention validation measurements of performance improvement in 76 woredas were conducted. The data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences.

resultFor this study, ten sessions of two-day trainings were conducted for 1306 staff. Additionally, on-site mentoring and coaching was conducted for a period of three months. The average EHCRIG standards met before and after intervention totaled 59 and 66%, respectively. The scores showed a positive correlation coefficient (r = 0.74) with statistical significant paired sample t-test with t = - 7.15, df = 75, P < 0.000. In addition, the mean scores among performance tiers were 74, 66 and 65% for high, medium and low performing woredas respectively. The One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed a borderline significant difference between groups with (F = 2.4, P < 0.09).

conclusionsThe implementation of the standards has garnered significant improvements in performance at the primary health care level. Therefore, continuing the initiated strengthening of health system performance against the standards and evaluation of the quality of primary health services is recommended.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnalysis of VarianceClinical CompetenceDelivery of Health CareEducational StatusEthiopiaFemaleGovernment ProgramsHealth PersonnelHumansMalePrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementEHCRIGsHealth center reformPerformance improvementPrimary health careStandards

Identifiers

PMID30782158
PMCPMC6381692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.