SynthesisBMC medical education2019
Curriculum management/monitoring in undergraduate medical education: a systematized review.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of generative artificial intelligence on clinical skills and knowledge acquisition in medical undergraduates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- The violence of curriculum: Dismantling systemic racism, colonisation and indigenous erasure within medical education.Medical education · 2025Article
- Implementing primary care concepts in higher education: a mixed method study in Flanders (Belgium).BMC primary care · 2024Article
- The progress test as a structuring initiative for programmatic assessment.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Assessment of medical students' knowledge of primary limb sarcomas.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- How often do medical students change career preferences over the course of medical school?BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Practical Guide to Undergraduate Medical Curriculum Alignment and Mapping.Advances in medical education and practice · 2023Article
- Bioethics curriculum in medical schools in Portuguese-speaking countries.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Approaching an undergraduate medical curriculum map: challenges and expectations.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- The Use of Mobile Devices to Enhance Engagement and Integration with Curricular Content.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2020Article
- Dimensions of challenges in transformation from traditional to integrated modular curriculum - Experiences from Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- A comparative analysis of psychiatry curriculum at undergraduate level of Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring and management of undergraduate medical education (UME) curricula are crucial contributors to successful medical education. This systematized review explores the different approaches that medical schools have to UME curriculum management or monitoring in order to provide a basis for curriculum managers.
methodsPubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and ERIC were searched with no time limitation using the keywords curriculum, medicine, management, monitoring, and alignment. Advanced search options and Boolean operators 'AND' and 'OR' were also used to find more relevant records.
resultsFrom a total of 673 records, 14 articles along with 7 papers from hand searching and snowballing were included in the review. Documents were categorized into 3 groups of UME curriculum management: developing computerized tools, surveying curriculum stakeholders and reviewing curriculum documents, and introducing managerial structures.
conclusionsDifferent approaches are reported for UME curriculum management/monitoring at different levels. Managerial structures and computerized tools are most frequently used at the college level because of the large number of faculty members who are responsible for the UME curriculum delivery and the large amount of complex curriculum information. Surveys and reviews of curriculum documents are used mostly to manage a part of a UME curriculum or to monitor teaching of a certain subject during all or some of the educational years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.