Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782151›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2019

Accuracy of the Delirium Observational Screening Scale (DOS) as a screening tool for delirium in patients with advanced cancer.

Elisabeth C W Neefjes, Maurice J D L van der Vorst, Manon S A Boddaert, Bea A T T Verdegaal, Aart Beeker, Saskia C C Teunissen, Aartjan T F Beekman, Wouter W A Zuurmond, Johannes Berkhof, Henk M W Verheul

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01539733 (Early Recognition and Optimal Treatment of Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01539733 nacompletednot on this map

Early Recognition and Optimal Treatment of Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2010 to 2017Enrolled101ConditionsDelirium, Advanced CancerArmsOlanzapine, Haloperidol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elisabeth C W NeefjesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maurice J D L van der VorstDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Manon S A BoddaertNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Bea A T T VerdegaalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Aart BeekerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Saskia C C TeunissenDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Aartjan T F BeekmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Bilt, The Netherlands.
Wouter W A ZuurmondDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes BerkhofDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk M W VerheulDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, Rm 3A46, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, the Netherlands. h.verheul@vumc.nl.

Funding

ZonMw 11510011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOS) was developed to facilitate early recognition of delirium by nurses during routine clinical care. It has shown good validity in a variety of patient populations, but has not yet been validated in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer, although the DOS is commonly used in this setting in daily practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the DOS in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer using the revised version of the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R

methodsPatients with advanced cancer admitted to the medical oncology ward were screened for delirium with the DOS and DRS-R-98. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of the DOS were calculated, using a DOS score ≥ 3 as a cut-off for delirium.

resultsNinety-five DOS negative and 98 DOS positive patients were identified. Sensitivity of the DOS, was > 99.9% (95%-CI, 95.8-100.0%), specificity was 99.5% (95%-CI 95.5-99.96%), PPV was 94.6% (95% CI 88.0-97.7), and NPV was > 99.9% (95% CI 96.1-100.0).

conclusionsThe DOS is an accurate screening tool for delirium in patients with advanced cancer. Since it has the benefit of being easily implicated in daily practice, we recommend to educate caregivers to screen patients with advanced cancer by DOS analysis. By early recognition and adequate treatment of this distressing delirium syndrome the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer can be improved.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01539733 (Feb 27, 2012 - retrospectively registered), Netherlands Trial Register NTR2559 (Oct 7, 2010).

Indexed as

Oncology NursingPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAgedData AccuracyDeliriumEarly DiagnosisFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsNeuropsychological TestsPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeDeliriumDiagnosisNeoplasmsPalliative careValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID30782151
PMCPMC6379928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.