Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782142›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2019

Physical activity-related health and economic benefits of building walkable neighbourhoods: a modelled comparison between brownfield and greenfield developments.

Belén Zapata-Diomedi, Claire Boulangé, Billie Giles-Corti, Kath Phelan, Simon Washington, J Lennert Veerman, Lucy Dubrelle Gunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Sedentarism and Chronic Health Problems.Korean journal of family medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Italian Physical Fitness Decline: A True Fact or a Mindset? A 10-Year Observational Perspective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Belén Zapata-DiomediSchool of Medicine, Griffith University Gold Coast, Building 40, level 8, room 8.38, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia. b.zapatadiomedi@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9238-0375
Claire BoulangéRMIT University, Healthy Liveable Cities Group, Centre for Urban Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Billie Giles-CortiRMIT University, Healthy Liveable Cities Group, Centre for Urban Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kath PhelanInfrastructure Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Simon WashingtonSchool of Civil Engineering, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
J Lennert VeermanSchool of Medicine, Griffith University Gold Coast, Building 40, level 8, room 8.38, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Lucy Dubrelle GunnRMIT University, Healthy Liveable Cities Group, Centre for Urban Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA consensus is emerging in the literature that urban form can impact health by either facilitating or deterring physical activity (PA). However, there is a lack of evidence measuring population health and the economic benefits relating to alternative urban forms. We examined the issue of housing people within two distinct types of urban development forms: a medium-density brownfield development in an established area with existing amenities (e.g. daily living destinations, transit), and a low-density suburban greenfield development. We predicted the health and economic benefits of a brownfield development compared with a greenfield development through their influence on PA.

methodsWe combined a new Walkability Planning Support System (Walkability PSS) with a quantitative health impact assessment model. We used the Walkability PSS to estimate the probability of residents' transport walking, based on their exposure to urban form in the brownfield and greenfield developments. We developed the underlying algorithms of the Walkability PSS using multi-level multivariate logistic regression analysis based on self-reported data for transport walking from the Victorian Integrated Survey of Transport and Activity 2009-10 and objectively measured urban form in the developments. We derived the difference in transport walking minutes per week based on the probability of transport walking in each of the developments and the average transport walking time per week among those who reported any transport walking. We then used the well-established method of the proportional multi-cohort multi-state life table model to translate the difference in transport walking minutes per week into health and economic benefits.

resultsIf adult residents living in the greenfield neighbourhood were instead exposed to the urban development form observed in a brownfield neighbourhood, the incidence and mortality of physical inactivity-related chronic diseases would decrease. Over the life course of the exposed population (21,000), we estimated 1600 health-adjusted life years gained and economic benefits of A$94 million. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that planning policies that create walkable neighbourhoods with access to shops, services and public transport will lead to substantial health and economic benefits associated with reduced incidence of physical inactivity related diseases and premature death.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEnvironment DesignResidence CharacteristicsSuburban PopulationUrban PopulationWalkingAdultChronic DiseaseCommerceFemaleHealthHousingHumansLogistic ModelsMaleModels, TheoreticalBrownfieldBuilt environmentDevelopmentEvaluationGreenfieldHealth and economic benefitsHealth impact assessmentPhysical activityPublic healthUrban form

Identifiers

PMID30782142
PMCPMC6381620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.