Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782121›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019

Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.

Pascal Duenk, Mario P L Calus, Yvonne C J Wientjes, Vivian P Breen, John M Henshall, Rachel Hawken, Piter Bijma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pascal DuenkAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. pascal.duenk@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8403-968X
Mario P L CalusAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Yvonne C J WientjesAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Vivian P BreenCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, 72761-1030, USA.
John M HenshallCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, 72761-1030, USA.
Rachel HawkenCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, 72761-1030, USA.
Piter BijmaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen 14291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn pig and poultry breeding programs, the breeding goal is to improve crossbred (CB) performance, whereas selection in the purebred (PB) lines is often based on PB performance. Thus, response to selection may be suboptimal, because the genetic correlation between PB and CB performance ([Formula: see text]) is generally lower than 1. Accurate estimates of the [Formula: see text] are needed, so that breeders can decide if they should collect data from CB animals. [Formula: see text] can be estimated either from pedigree or genomic relationships, which may produce different results. With genomic relationships, the [Formula: see text] estimate could be improved when relationships between purebred and crossbred animals are based only on the alleles that originate from the PB line of interest. This work presents the first comparison of estimated [Formula: see text] and variance components of body weight in broilers, using pedigree-based or genotype-based models, where the breed-of-origin of alleles was either ignored or considered. We used genotypes and body weight measurements of PB and CB animals that have a common sire line.

resultsOur results showed that the [Formula: see text] estimates depended on the relationship matrix used. Estimates were 5 to 25% larger with genotype-based models than with pedigree-based models. Moreover, [Formula: see text] estimates were similar (max. 7% difference) regardless of whether the model considered breed-of-origin of alleles or not. Standard errors of [Formula: see text] estimates were smaller with genotype-based than with pedigree-based methods, and smaller with models that ignored breed-of-origin than with models that considered breed-of-origin.

conclusionsWe conclude that genotype-based models can be useful for estimating [Formula: see text], even when the PB and CB animals that have phenotypes are closely related. Considering breed-of-origin of alleles did not yield different estimates of [Formula: see text], probably because the parental breeds of the CB animals were distantly related.

Indexed as

GenotypePedigreeAnimalsBody WeightBreedingChickensFemaleMaleModels, GeneticPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID30782121
PMCPMC6381670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.