Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782041›Full record

ArticleInnate immunity2019

Comparison of different lots of endotoxin and evaluation of in vivo potency over time in the experimental human endotoxemia model.

Dorien Kiers, Guus P Leijte, Jelle Gerretsen, Jelle Zwaag, Matthijs Kox, Peter Pickkers

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Innate immunity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05751837 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study of Intra-Tumoral Lipopolysaccharide Immunotherapy for Intra-Abdominal Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorPatrick Wagner, MD, FACSRan2023 to 2024Enrolled12ConditionsAbdominal Cancer, MalignancyArmsLipopolysaccharide
NCT07092215 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Mechanisms of Pain Hypersensitivity in a Human Skin Inflammation Model - A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorStefan HeberRan2025 to 2025Enrolled42ConditionsPainArmsSynthetic interstitial fluid (SIF) / SIF neutral pH, Synthetic interstitial fluid (SIF) / SIF acidic pH, Synthetic interstitial fluid (SIF) / SIF acidic pH + BCTC 1 µM, LPS 5 ng / SIF neutral pH, LPS 5 ng / SIF acidic pH
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Endotoxins and Biological Implications-Review.Public health challenges · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Gut microbiota's role in heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Septic acute kidney injury: a review of basic research.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorien Kiers1 Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Guus P Leijte1 Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5750-1434
Jelle Gerretsen1 Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jelle Zwaag1 Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Matthijs Kox1 Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Peter Pickkers1 Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experimental human endotoxemia model is used to study the systemic inflammatory response in vivo. The previously used lot of endotoxin, which was used for over a decade, is no longer approved for human use and a new Good Manufacturing Practices-grade batch has become available. We compared the inflammatory response induced by either bolus or continuous administration of either the previously used lot #1188844 or new lots of endotoxin (#94332B1 and #94332B4). Compared with lot #1188844, bolus administration of lot #94332B1 induced a more pronounced systemic inflammatory response including higher plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and more pronounced clinical signs of inflammation. In contrast, continuous infusion of lot #94332B4 resulted in a slightly less pronounced inflammatory response compared with lot #1188844. Furthermore, we evaluated whether lot #1188844 displayed in vivo potency loss by reviewing inflammatory parameters obtained from 17 endotoxemia studies performed in our centre between 2007 and 2016. Despite inter-study variability in endotoxemia-induced effects on temperature, heart rate, symptoms, and leukocyte counts, the magnitude of these effects did not decrease over time. In conclusion, although all lots of endotoxin induce a pronounced inflammatory response, the magnitude differs between lots. We observed no potency loss of endotoxin over time.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCytokinesEndotoxemiaEndotoxinsHeart RateHumansHydrocortisoneInfusions, IntravenousLeukocyte CountLot Quality Assurance SamplingMaleTime FactorsYoung AdultCytokinesEndotoxinsHydrocortisoneEndotoxemialipopolysaccharidepotencysystemic inflammation

Identifiers

PMID30782041
PMCPMC6830888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.