Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30781808›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2019

Evaluation of Sample Preparation Methods for the Analysis of Reef-Building Corals Using ¹H-NMR-Based Metabolomics.

Erik R Andersson, Rusty D Day, Julie M Loewenstein, Cheryl M Woodley, Tracey B Schock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Intraspecific variation in polar and nonpolar metabolite profiles of a threatened Caribbean coral.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erik R AnderssonGrice Marine Laboratory, Department of Biology, College of Charleston, 205 Fort Johnson Rd., Charleston, SC 29412, USA. anderssoner@g.cofc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7968-7057
Rusty D DayHollings Marine Laboratory, Chemical Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Charleston, SC 29412, USA. rusty.day@manta-online.org.
Julie M LoewensteinGrice Marine Laboratory, Department of Biology, College of Charleston, 205 Fort Johnson Rd., Charleston, SC 29412, USA. loewensteinjm@g.cofc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4618-5277
Cheryl M WoodleyHollings Marine Laboratory, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Charleston, SC 29412, USA. cheryl.woodley@noaa.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7532-2934
Tracey B SchockHollings Marine Laboratory, Chemical Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Charleston, SC 29412, USA. tracey.schock@nist.gov.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · USCollege of Charleston · USNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of metabolomics generally lacks standardized methods for the preparation of samples prior to analysis. This is especially true for metabolomics of reef-building corals, where the handful of studies that were published employ a range of sample preparation protocols. The utilization of metabolomics may prove essential in understanding coral biology in the face of increasing environmental threats, and an optimized method for preparing coral samples for metabolomics analysis would aid this cause. The current study evaluates three important steps during sample processing of stony corals: (i) metabolite extraction, (ii) metabolism preservation, and (iii) subsampling. Results indicate that a modified Bligh and Dyer extraction is more reproducible across multiple coral species compared to methyl

Indexed as

coralmetabolomicsmethodNMR spectroscopysample preparation

Identifiers

PMID30781808
PMCPMC6410050
OpenAlexW2912661927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.