Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30781792›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Double Discourse: Qualitative Perspectives on Breast Screening Participation among Obese Women and Their Health Care Providers.

Kate A McBride, Catharine A K Fleming, Emma S George, Genevieve Z Steiner, Freya MacMillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kate A McBrideTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia. k.mcbride@westernsydney.edu.au.
Catharine A K FlemingTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia. catharine.fleming@westernsydney.edu.au.
Emma S GeorgeTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia. e.george@westernsydney.edu.au.
Genevieve Z SteinerTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia. g.steiner@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-6104
Freya MacMillanTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia. f.macmillan@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3176-2465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity in Australia is rising rapidly, and is a major public health concern. Obesity increases the risk of breast cancer and worsens associated outcomes, yet breast screening participation rates in Australia are suboptimal and can be lower in higher risk, obese women. This study qualitatively explored barriers to breast screening participation in obese women in Australia. In-depth interviews (

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAgedAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedObesityPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchRiskbreast screeninghealth service utilizationmammogramsobesity

Identifiers

PMID30781792
PMCPMC6407106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.