Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30781719›Full record

ArticleGenes2019

PheWAS-Based Systems Genetics Methods for Anti-Breast Cancer Drug Discovery.

Min Gao, Yuan Quan, Xiong-Hui Zhou, Hong-Yu Zhang

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min GaoHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. gm@webmail.hzau.edu.cn.
Yuan QuanSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China. quanyuan725@163.com.
Xiong-Hui ZhouHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. zhouxionghui@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Hong-Yu ZhangHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. zhy630@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a high-risk disease worldwide. For such complex diseases that are induced by multiple pathogenic genes, determining how to establish an effective drug discovery strategy is a challenge. In recent years, a large amount of genetic data has accumulated, particularly in the genome-wide identification of disorder genes. However, understanding how to use these data efficiently for pathogenesis elucidation and drug discovery is still a problem because the gene⁻disease links that are identified by high-throughput techniques such as phenome-wide association studies (PheWASs) are usually too weak to have biological significance. Systems genetics is a thriving area of study that aims to understand genetic interactions on a genome-wide scale. In this study, we aimed to establish two effective strategies for identifying breast cancer genes based on the systems genetics algorithm. As a result, we found that the GeneRank-based strategy, which combines the prognostic phenotype-based gene-dependent network with the phenotypic-related PheWAS data, can promote the identification of breast cancer genes and the discovery of anti-breast cancer drugs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPharmacogenomic VariantsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDrug DiscoveryDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansAntineoplastic Agentsbreast cancerdrug discoveryPheWASsystems genetics

Identifiers

PMID30781719
PMCPMC6409623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.