Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30781625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

From Science to Policy and Practice: A Critical Assessment of Knowledge Management before, during, and after Environmental Public Health Disasters.

Mélissa Généreux, Marc Lafontaine, Angela Eykelbosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating Community Resilience and Associated Factors One Year after the Catastrophic Fort McMurray Flood.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Long-Term Impact of Disasters on the Public Health System: A Multi-Case Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Maintaining Preparedness to Severe Though Infrequent Threats-Can It Be Done?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. The Integration of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support and Disaster Risk Reduction: A mapping and Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  20. Research Frontiers of Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management: What Do We Know So Far?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mélissa GénéreuxEastern Townships Integrated University Centre in Health and Social Services-Sherbrooke Hospital University Centre, Sherbrooke, QC J1G 1B1, Canada. Melissa.genereux@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6269-8801
Marc LafontaineChemical Emergency Preparedness and Response Unit, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. marc.lafontaine@canada.ca.
Angela EykelboshNational Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4C2, Canada. angela.eykelbosh@bccdc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canada regularly faces environmental public health (EPH) disasters. Given the importance of evidence-based, risk-informed decision-making, we aimed to critically assess the integration of EPH expertise and research into each phase of disaster management. In-depth interviews were conducted with 23 leaders in disaster management from Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, and were complemented by other qualitative methods. Three topics were examined: governance, knowledge creation/translation, and related barriers/needs. Data were analyzed through a four-step content analysis. Six critical success factors emerged from the analysis: blending the best of traditional and modern approaches; fostering community engagement; cultivating relationships; investing in preparedness and recovery; putting knowledge into practice; and ensuring sufficient human and financial resources. Several promising knowledge-to-action strategies were also identified, including mentorship programs, communities of practice, advisory groups, systematized learning, and comprehensive repositories of tools and resources. There is no single roadmap to incorporate EPH expertise and research into disaster management. Our findings suggest that preparation for and management of EPH disaster risks requires effective long-term collaboration between science, policy, and EPH practitioners at all levels in order to facilitate coordinated and timely deployment of multi-sectoral/jurisdictional resources when and where they are most needed.

Indexed as

DisastersEnvironmental HealthPublic HealthCanadaDisaster PlanningHealth PolicyKnowledge ManagementModels, Theoreticaldisaster risk managementenvironmental public healthknowledge managementknowledge transfer

Identifiers

PMID30781625
PMCPMC6407109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.