Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30781454›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Rational Use of Antibiotics in Neonates: Still in Search of Tailored Tools.

John van den Anker, Karel Allegaert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Paediatric Rational Prescribing: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effect of antibiotics in the first week of life on faecal microbiota development.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John van den AnkerDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA. JvandenA@childrensnational.org.
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. karel.allegaert@uzleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9921-5105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rational medicine use in neonates implies the prescription and administration of age-appropriate drug formulations, selecting the most efficacious and safe dose, all based on accurate information on the drug and its indications in neonates. This review illustrates that important uncertainties still exist concerning the different aspects (

Indexed as

antibioticsnewbornrational drug usesafetystewardship

Identifiers

PMID30781454
PMCPMC6473895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.