Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30781369›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2019

Comparison of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Communities Living in Hotspot and Non-Hotspot Areas of Dengue in Selangor, Malaysia.

Nurul Akmar Ghani, Shamarina Shohaimi, Alvin Kah-Wei Hee, Hui-Yee Chee, Oguntade Emmanuel, Lamidi Sarumoh Alaba Ajibola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dengue Seroprevalence and Factors Associated with Dengue Seropositivity in Petaling District, Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nurul Akmar GhaniDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. nurulakmar0111@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5582-7265
Shamarina ShohaimiCentre of Foundation Studies for Agricultural Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. shamarina@upm.edu.my.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-6627
Alvin Kah-Wei HeeDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. alvinhee@upm.edu.my.ORCID 0000-0002-2920-407X
Hui-Yee CheeDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. cheehy@upm.edu.my.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-627X
Oguntade EmmanuelInstitute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. oguntadeemmanuel2015@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-6240
Lamidi Sarumoh Alaba AjibolaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. lalabaajibolasarulam@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-3027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue has affected more than one-third of the world population and Malaysia has recorded an increase in the number of dengue cases since 2012. Selangor state recorded the highest number of dengue cases in Malaysia. Most of the dengue infections occur among people living in hotspot areas of dengue. This study aims to compare Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among communities living in hotspot and non-hotspot dengue areas.

methodCommunities living in 20 hotspot and 20 non-hotspot areas in Selangor were chosen in this study where 406 participants were randomly selected to answer questionnaires distributed at their housing areas. Total marks of each categories were compared using

resultResults show that there were significant mean differences in marks in Knowledge (

conclusionOverall results show that people living in non-hotspot areas had better knowledge and attitude than people living in hotspot areas, but no difference was found in practice. This suggests that public health education should be done more frequently with people with a low education background and low household income, especially in hotspot areas to fight dengue outbreak and make dengue cases decrease effectively.

Indexed as

denguedengue hotspotdengue incidenceknowledge attitude practice (KAP)

Identifiers

PMID30781369
PMCPMC6473475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.