Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30780375›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2019

Dynamic vaccination in partially overlapped multiplex network.

L G Alvarez-Zuzek, M A Di Muro, S Havlin, L A Braunstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L G Alvarez-ZuzekDepartamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, and Instituto de Investigaciones Físicas de Mar del Plata (IFIMAR-CONICET), Deán Funes 3350, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina.
M A Di MuroDepartamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, and Instituto de Investigaciones Físicas de Mar del Plata (IFIMAR-CONICET), Deán Funes 3350, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina.
S HavlinDepartment of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel.
L A BraunsteinDepartamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, and Instituto de Investigaciones Físicas de Mar del Plata (IFIMAR-CONICET), Deán Funes 3350, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina and Center for Polymer Studies, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we propose and investigate a strategy of vaccination which we call "dynamic vaccination." In our model, susceptible people become aware that one or more of their contacts are infected and thereby get vaccinated with probability ω, before having physical contact with any infected patient. Then the nonvaccinated individuals will be infected with probability β. We apply the strategy to the susceptible-infected-recovered epidemic model in a multiplex network composed by two networks, where a fraction q of the nodes acts in both networks. We map this model of dynamic vaccination into bond percolation model and use the generating functions framework to predict theoretically the behavior of the relevant magnitudes of the system at the steady state. We find a perfect agreement between the solutions of the theoretical equations and the results of stochastic simulations. In addition, we find an interesting phase diagram in the plane β-ω, which is composed of an epidemic and a nonepidemic phase, separated by a critical threshold line β_{c}, which depends on q. As q decreases, β_{c} increases, i.e., as the overlap decreases, the system is more disconnected, and therefore more virulent diseases are needed to spread epidemics. Surprisingly, we find that, for all values of q, a region in the diagram where the vaccination is so efficient that, regardless of the virulence of the disease, it never becomes an epidemic. We compare our strategy with random immunization and find that, using the same amount of vaccines for both scenarios, we obtain that the spread of disease is much lower in the case of dynamic vaccination when compared to random immunization. Furthermore, we also compare our strategy with targeted immunization and we find that, depending on ω, dynamic vaccination will perform significantly better and in some cases will stop the disease before it becomes an epidemic.

Identifiers

PMID30780375
PMCPMC7217549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.