Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30779779›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Optimization of irradiation dose to Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus in a sterile insect technique program.

J Guillermo Bond, Adriana R Osorio, Nancy Avila, Yeudiel Gómez-Simuta, Carlos F Marina, Ildefonso Fernández-Salas, Pablo Liedo, Ariane Dor, Danilo O Carvalho, Kostas Bourtzis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sterility ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J Guillermo BondCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Adriana R OsorioCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Nancy AvilaCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Yeudiel Gómez-SimutaPrograma Moscas de la Fruta (SAGARPA-IICA), Camino a Cacaotales S/N, Metapa de Domínguez, Chiapas, Mexico.
Carlos F MarinaCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Ildefonso Fernández-SalasCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP-INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Pablo LiedoEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Ariane DorEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Danilo O CarvalhoInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8168-4050
Kostas BourtzisInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria.
Trevor WilliamsInstituto de Ecología AC (INECOL), Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-3440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sterile insect technique (SIT) may offer a means to control the transmission of mosquito borne diseases. SIT involves the release of male insects that have been sterilized by exposure to ionizing radiation. We determined the effects of different doses of radiation on the survival and reproductive capacity of local strains of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus in southern Mexico. The survival of irradiated pupae was invariably greater than 90% and did not differ significantly in either sex for either species. Irradiation had no significant adverse effects on the flight ability (capacity to fly out of a test device) of male mosquitoes, which consistently exceeded 91% in Ae. aegypti and 96% in Ae. albopictus. The average number of eggs laid per female was significantly reduced in Ae. aegypti at doses of 15 and 30 Gy and no eggs were laid by females that had been exposed to 50 Gy. Similarly, in Ae. albopictus, egg production was reduced at doses of 15 and 25 Gy and was eliminated at 35 Gy. In Ae. aegypti, fertility in males was eliminated at 70 Gy and was eliminated at 30 Gy in females, whereas in Ae. albopictus, the fertility of males that mated with untreated females was almost zero (0.1%) in the 50 Gy treatment and female fertility was eliminated at 35 Gy. Irradiation treatments resulted in reduced ovary length and fewer follicles in both species. The adult median survival time of both species was reduced by irradiation in a dose-dependent manner. However, sterilizing doses of 35 Gy and 50 Gy resulted in little reduction in survival times of males of Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, respectively, indicating that these doses should be suitable for future evaluations of SIT-based control of these species. The results of the present study will be applied to studies of male sexual competitiveness and to stepwise evaluations of the sterile insect technique for population suppression of these vectors in Mexico.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsFertilityInfertilityInsectaMaleMexicoMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsRadiation DosageRadiation, IonizingRadiotherapy DosageSexual Behavior, AnimalSterilization, Reproductive

Identifiers

PMID30779779
PMCPMC6380561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.