Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30779693›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2019

Dosimetric Impact of a New Computational Voxel Phantom Series for the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors: Children and Adults.

Keith Griffin, Colin Paulbeck, Wesley Bolch, Harry Cullings, Stephen Egbert, Sachiyo Funamoto, Tatsuhiko Sato, Akira Endo, Nolan Hertel, Choonsik Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Keith Griffina Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Colin Paulbeckb J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Wesley Bolchb J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Harry Cullingsc Department of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Stephen Egbertd Leidos, Inc., Reston, Virginia.
Sachiyo Funamotoc Department of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tatsuhiko Satoe Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokaimura, Japan.
Akira Endoe Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokaimura, Japan.
Nolan Hertelf George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Choonsik Leea Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the largest sources of data on radiation exposure in humans is the study of the atomic bomb survivors at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan performed by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF). As part of their retrospective dosimetry efforts for the atomic bomb survivors, RERF published two core systems: Dosimetry System 1986 (DS86) and Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02). Due to computing limitations at the time, only three stylized phantoms (an infant, child and adult) were used in DS86 and DS02 to represent the entire Japanese population. In this study, we sought to evaluate the dosimetric differences that should be expected from using an updated and age-expanded phantom series with the survivor cohort. To this end, we developed a new series of hybrid phantoms, based on the Japanese population of 1945, which has greater anatomical realism and improved age resolution over those used by RERF. These phantoms were converted to voxel format and compared to their older counterparts through the calculation of organ dose coefficients using DS02 free-in-air particle fluences at three distances from the bomb hypocenter. From the photon portion of the spectra, organ dose differences of up to nearly 25% are expected between the old and new series, while organ dose differences of up to nearly 70% are expected from the neutron portion. We also compared organ dose coefficients among themselves to determine the accuracy in the use of one organ dose as the epidemiological surrogate to another. Certain organ-surrogate pairs were shown to be inappropriate, such as the use of colon dose for breast risk analyses. Overall, our new series of phantoms provides significant improvements to survivor organ dosimetry, especially to those survivors who were previously misrepresented in body size by their stylized phantom and to those who experienced a highly-directional irradiation field.

Indexed as

Nuclear WeaponsPhantoms, ImagingSurvivorsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornJapanMaleRadiometryRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30779693
PMCPMC8666129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.