Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30779689›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Immunogenicity and safety of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine produced in Shenzhen, China versus a comparator influenza vaccine: a phase IV randomized study.

Yuemei Hu, Kai Chu, Nathalie Lavis, Xiaoling Li, Bill Liang, Shuzhen Liu, Ming Shao, Jean-Denis Shu, Cynthia Tabar, Sandrine Samson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03344029 (Immunogenicity and Safety of the Shenzhen Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Versus a Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Comparator in Healthy Chinese Subjects Aged 18 to 59 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03344029 phase4completednot on this map

Immunogenicity and Safety of the Shenzhen Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Versus a Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Comparator in Healthy Chinese Subjects Aged 18 to 59 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,600ConditionsInfluenza, FluArmsSP Shz TIV, Hualan TIV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuemei Hua Vaccine Clinical Evaluation Department , Jiangsu Center for Disease Prevention and Control , Nanjing , China.
Kai Chua Vaccine Clinical Evaluation Department , Jiangsu Center for Disease Prevention and Control , Nanjing , China.
Nathalie Lavisb Medical Operations , Sanofi Pasteur , Lyon , France.
Xiaoling Lic Medical Operations , Sanofi Pasteur , Beijing , China.
Bill Liangd Medical Department , Sanofi Pasteur , Beijing , China.
Shuzhen Liue Division of Respiratory Virus Vaccines , National Institutes for Food and Drug Control , Beijing , China.
Ming Shaoe Division of Respiratory Virus Vaccines , National Institutes for Food and Drug Control , Beijing , China.
Jean-Denis Shuf Medical Department , Sanofi Pasteur , Lyon , France.
Cynthia Tabarg Clinical Operations , Sanofi Pasteur , Lyon , France.
Sandrine Samsonh Global Medical , Sanofi Pasteur , Swiftwater , PA , USA.
Sanofi (France) · FRJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNSanofi (China) · CNSanofi (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal influenza causes substantial morbidity and mortality in China, which largely results from limited vaccine accessibility and poor vaccination coverage. Since 2013, Sanofi Pasteur's facilities in Shenzhen, China have produced a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (Shz-IIV3) for each influenza season according to Chinese pharmacopeia requirements. However, the immunogenicity of Shz-IIV3 has not been compared to existing Chinese trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV3s). Here, we describe the results of a phase IV, observer-blind, randomized study to evaluate whether the immunogenicity of Shz-IIV3 was non-inferior to a comparator IIV3 (Hualan Biological Engineering Inc) also manufactured and licensed in China. Healthy adults aged 18-59 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 0.5-mL intramuscular injection of the 2017-2018 Northern Hemisphere formulation of Shz-IIV3 (n = 800) or the comparator IIV3 (n = 799). Between baseline and day 28 after vaccination, hemagglutination inhibition titers for the three vaccine strains increased by at least 4-fold and were of similar magnitude in Shz-IIV3 and comparator IIV3 recipients. The rate of seroconversion or significant increase in titers was 62% to 92% in Shz-IIV3 recipients, and 63% to 91% in comparator IIV3 recipients. Post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition titers and seroconversion rates for Shz-IIV3 were statistically non-inferior to the comparator IIV3 for all three influenza vaccine strains. Rates of solicited and unsolicited vaccine-related adverse events were similar between the two vaccine groups. These results demonstrated that Shz-IIV3 was as immunogenic and safe in adults as a comparator Chinese IIV3, and support the continued use of Shz-IIV3 in China.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntramuscularMaleMiddle AgedSeroconversionVaccines, InactivatedYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedChinaimmunogenicityinfluenzareactogenicitysafetyTrivalent influenza vaccinesvaccination

Identifiers

PMID30779689
PMCPMC6605815
OpenAlexW2916414362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.