ArticleCirculation2019
Sudden Cardiac Death in Women.
Article in Circulation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.Heart rhythm · 2021Guideline
- The effect of an anti-malarial herbal remedy, Maytenus senegalensis, on electrocardiograms of healthy Tanzanian volunteers.Malaria journal · 2024Trial
- Concentration-QT modelling of the novel DHFR inhibitor P218 in healthy male volunteers.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Trial
- Markers of Myocardial Stress, Myocardial Injury, and Subclinical Inflammation and the Risk of Sudden Death.Circulation · 2020Trial
- Sex, Racial/Ethnic, and Regional Disparities in Mortality Involving Both Cardiac Arrest and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among U.S. Adults, 1999-2020.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Breast arterial calcification rates in screening mammography patients without a history of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).Clinical imaging · 2026Article
- Morning peak and high prevalence of pulmonary embolism and psychiatric disorders in women with sudden cardiac arrest: results from the ReCaPTa study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Trends in sudden death-attributed mortality across Europe, 2010-2020: a retrospective population-based analysis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Identifying risk patterns for sudden cardiac death in athletes: A clustering and principal component analysis approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- Left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial fibrosis in sudden cardiac death.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Machine learning for sudden cardiac death prediction among older adults using community-based electronic health records.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Demographics and Trends of Sudden Cardiac Death-Related Mortality in the United States, 1999 to 2022.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Sex differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Sudden cardiac arrest prediction via deep learning electrocardiogram analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Sudden Cardiac Death-Etiology, Risk Factors and Demographic Characteristics: An Extensive Study of 1618 Forensic Autopsies.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Alcohol Abuse Disorder Fatality, from Alcohol Binges to Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Autopsy of all young sudden death cases is important to increase survival in family members left behind.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Liver X Receptor Agonist 4β-Hydroxycholesterol as a Prognostic Factor in Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Observational
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite recent progress in profiling of risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) and prevention and intervention of cardiac diseases, SCD remains a major cause of death. Among women, the incidence of SCD is significant, but lower than in men, particularly in the premenopausal and early postmenopausal years. Possibly, as a consequence of the difference in population burden, the mechanisms and risk markers of SCD are not as well defined for women. The aim of this study was to determine the autopsy findings and causes of death among women in a large SCD population. Additionally, we sought to classify prior ECG characteristics in male and female subjects with SCD.
methodsThe Fingesture study has systematically collected clinical and autopsy data from subjects with SCD in Northern Finland between 1998 and 2017. The cohort consists of 5869 subjects with SCD. Previously recorded ECGs were available and analyzed in 1101 subjects (18.8% of total population; and in 25.3% of women).
resultsFemale subjects with SCD were significantly older than men: 70.1±13.1 years versus 63.5±11.8 years (mean ± standard deviation, P<0.001). The most frequently identified cause of death was ischemic heart disease in both sexes: 71.7% among women versus 75.7% among men, P=0.005. In contrast, women were more likely to have nonischemic cause of SCD than men (28.3% versus 24.3%, P=0.005). The prevalence of primary myocardial fibrosis was higher among women (5.2%, n=64) than in men (2.6%, n=120; P<0.001). Female subjects with SCD were more likely to have normal prior ECG tracings (22.2% versus 15.3% in men, P<0.001). A normal ECG was even more common among nonischemic female subjects with SCD (27.8% versus 16.2% in men, P=0.009). However, ECG markers of left ventricular hypertrophy, with or without repolarization abnormalities, were more common among women (8.2%; 17.9%) than in men (4.9%; 10.6%, P=0.036; P<0.001, respectively).
conclusionsWomen were considerably older at the time of SCD and more commonly had nonischemic causes. Women were also more likely to have a prior normal ECG than men, but an increased marker for SCD risk based on ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy with repolarization abnormalities was more commonly observed in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.