Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30779256›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Evaluating the organizational structure and specificity of network topology within the face processing system.

Daniel B Elbich, Peter C M Molenaar, K Suzanne Scherf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex differences in development of functional connections in the face processing network.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel B ElbichDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-7786-7508
Peter C M MolenaarDepartment of Health & Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
K Suzanne ScherfDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-6362
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Investigating Dynamic Neural Systems Underlying Changing Social Representations of Faces During DevelopmentR01MH112573 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SCHERF, KATHRYN SUZANNE · 2017 to 2022
$3.1M
National Institutes of Mental Health R01 MH112573NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112573Penn State University, Social Science Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing appreciation that network-level interactions among regions produce components of face processing previously ascribed to individual regions. Our goals were to use an exhaustive data-driven approach to derive and quantify the topology of directed functional connections within a priori defined nodes of the face processing network and evaluate whether the topology is category-specific. Young adults were scanned with fMRI as they viewed movies of faces, objects, and scenes. We employed GIMME to model effective connectivity among core and extended face processing regions, which allowed us to evaluate all possible directional connections, under each viewing condition (face, object, place). During face processing, we observed directional connections from the right posterior superior temporal sulcus to both the right occipital face area and right fusiform face area (FFA), which does not reflect the topology reported in prior studies. We observed connectivity between core and extended regions during face processing, but this limited to a feed-forward connection from the FFA to the amygdala. Finally, the topology of connections was unique to face processing. These findings suggest that the pattern of directed functional connections within the face processing network, particularly in the right core regions, may not be as hierarchical and feed-forward as described previously. Our findings support the notion that topologies of network connections are specialized, emergent, and dynamically responsive to task demands.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmygdalaConnectomeFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetTemporal LobeYoung Adultamygdalaeffective connectivityface processingfMRIfusiform face areaposterior superior temporal sulcus

Identifiers

PMID30779256
PMCPMC6865463
OpenAlexW2915465945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.