Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30779254›Full record

ArticleMolecular reproduction and development2019

Improvement of in vitro and early in utero porcine clone development after somatic donor cells are cultured under hypoxia.

Bethany R Mordhorst, Joshua A Benne, Raissa F Cecil, Kristin M Whitworth, Melissa S Samuel, Lee D Spate, Clifton N Murphy, Kevin D Wells, Jonathan A Green, Randall S Prather

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular reproduction and development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Reproduction (Re)defined.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Current Techniques of Gene Editing in Pigs for Xenotransplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  4. Manipulating the Epigenome in Nuclear Transfer Cloning: Where, When and How.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bethany R MordhorstDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-3252
Joshua A BenneDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Raissa F CecilDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Kristin M WhitworthDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-9959-108X
Melissa S SamuelDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Lee D SpateDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Clifton N MurphyDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Kevin D WellsDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Jonathan A GreenDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Randall S PratherDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-6012-4035
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Resource Core for National Swine Resource and Research Center (NSRRC) Years 21-25U42OD011140 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI RANDALL S PRATHER · 2012 to 2026
$26.7M
Modification of SCNT donor cell metabolism to mimic blastomere metabolism R01HD080636 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI GREEN, JONATHAN A, PRATHER, RANDALL S · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080636NIH HHS U42 OD011140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically engineered pigs serve as excellent biomedical and agricultural models. To date, the most reliable way to generate genetically engineered pigs is via somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), however, the efficiency of cloning in pigs is low (1-3%). Somatic cells such as fibroblasts frequently used in nuclear transfer utilize the tricarboxylic acid cycle and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation for efficient energy production. The metabolism of somatic cells contrasts with cells within the early embryo, which predominately use glycolysis. We hypothesized that fibroblast cells could become blastomere-like if mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation was inhibited by hypoxia and that this would result in improved in vitro embryonic development after SCNT. In a previous study, we demonstrated that fibroblasts cultured under hypoxic conditions had changes in gene expression consistent with increased glycolytic/gluconeogenic metabolism. The goal of this pilot study was to determine if subsequent in vitro embryo development is impacted by cloning porcine embryonic fibroblasts cultured in hypoxia. Here we demonstrate that in vitro measures such as early cleavage, blastocyst development, and blastocyst cell number are improved (4.4%, 5.5%, and 17.6 cells, respectively) when donor cells are cultured in hypoxia before nuclear transfer. Survival probability was increased in clones from hypoxic cultured donors compared to controls (8.5 vs. 4.0 ± 0.2). These results suggest that the clones from donor cells cultured in hypoxia are more developmentally competent and this may be due to improved nuclear reprogramming during somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Indexed as

Nuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsBlastocystCell Culture TechniquesCell HypoxiaCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingCloning, OrganismEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFibroblastsPilot ProjectsPregnancySwineblastocystcell culturecloningfetal developmenthypoxialitter sizemetabolismnuclear transferporcine/pigpregnancyreprogrammingsomatic cell nuclear transfer

Identifiers

PMID30779254
PMCPMC6510642
OpenAlexW2915481315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.