ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2019
Real World Experience of Treating Neuroblastoma: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of undernutrition in children with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Adrenal neuroblastoma in adult: case report.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- When neuroblastoma steals a kidney: understanding autonephrectomy risks.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Management of neuroblastoma in limited-resource settings.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Neuroblastoma in a Developing Country: Miles to Go.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- Pediatric Neuroblastoma - Impact of Nutritional Status on Complications and Outcomes.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesManagement of neuroblastoma, especially high-risk (HR) disease is difficult in a resource-limited setting. There is a paucity of literature on outcomes of patients treated in India. The present study was conducted to analyse the clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes of patients with neuroblastoma treated at authors' centre.
methodsThe study was a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with neuroblastoma treated at authors' centre between 2000 to 2017. The International Neuroblastoma Staging System and risk grouping were used to classify patients as low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR). Treatment was individualised and risk-adapted. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsThe study included 85 patients with a median age of 4 y and 67% were males. Malnutrition was observed in 55% of patients. Adrenal gland was the most common site in 75% patients followed by mediastinum in 12%. LR was observed in 7/85 (8%) patients, IR 20/85 (24%) and HR in 58/85 (68%) patients. The CCG-3891 protocol was used to treat 80% of the patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed in 32% of HR patients. The median follow-up was 16.6 mo. The median EFS and OS for all patients were 19.2 mo and 26.9 mo respectively and the 3 y EFS and OS was 36% and 47% respectively. The 3y EFS for LR, IR and HR patients was 100%, 54%, and 18.9% respectively (P < 0.001) and for OS was 100%, 77%, and 34% respectively (P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, a hemoglobin less than 10 g% predicted inferior EFS (P = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.005) for all patients. For patients with high-risk disease, on multivariate analysis, hemoglobin (P = 0.002) and 13-Cis Retinoic acid maintenance (P = 0.002) predicted EFS and only radiotherapy to the primary (P = 0.01) predicted OS. Only 4/19 (21%) are alive and in remission post ASCT.
conclusionsMajority of patients with neuroblastoma presented to authors' centre with advanced disease. Survival outcomes of patients with LR disease are excellent. However, patients with HR disease have poor outcomes despite multimodality management. Non-availability of N-MYC testing in few patients could have falsely down-staged them to IR from HR. A low hemoglobin at diagnosis is a poor predictor of outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30778950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.