Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30778950›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2019

Real World Experience of Treating Neuroblastoma: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India.

Venkatraman Radhakrishnan, Anand Raja, Manikandan Dhanushkodi, T S Ganesan, G Selvaluxmy, T G Sagar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of neuroblastoma in limited-resource settings.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  5. Neuroblastoma in a Developing Country: Miles to Go.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Venkatraman RadhakrishnanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. venkymd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7557-5816
Anand RajaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Manikandan DhanushkodiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
T S GanesanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
G SelvaluxmyDepartment of Radiotherapy, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
T G SagarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesManagement of neuroblastoma, especially high-risk (HR) disease is difficult in a resource-limited setting. There is a paucity of literature on outcomes of patients treated in India. The present study was conducted to analyse the clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes of patients with neuroblastoma treated at authors' centre.

methodsThe study was a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with neuroblastoma treated at authors' centre between 2000 to 2017. The International Neuroblastoma Staging System and risk grouping were used to classify patients as low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR). Treatment was individualised and risk-adapted. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsThe study included 85 patients with a median age of 4 y and 67% were males. Malnutrition was observed in 55% of patients. Adrenal gland was the most common site in 75% patients followed by mediastinum in 12%. LR was observed in 7/85 (8%) patients, IR 20/85 (24%) and HR in 58/85 (68%) patients. The CCG-3891 protocol was used to treat 80% of the patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed in 32% of HR patients. The median follow-up was 16.6 mo. The median EFS and OS for all patients were 19.2 mo and 26.9 mo respectively and the 3 y EFS and OS was 36% and 47% respectively. The 3y EFS for LR, IR and HR patients was 100%, 54%, and 18.9% respectively (P < 0.001) and for OS was 100%, 77%, and 34% respectively (P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, a hemoglobin less than 10 g% predicted inferior EFS (P = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.005) for all patients. For patients with high-risk disease, on multivariate analysis, hemoglobin (P = 0.002) and 13-Cis Retinoic acid maintenance (P = 0.002) predicted EFS and only radiotherapy to the primary (P = 0.01) predicted OS. Only 4/19 (21%) are alive and in remission post ASCT.

conclusionsMajority of patients with neuroblastoma presented to authors' centre with advanced disease. Survival outcomes of patients with LR disease are excellent. However, patients with HR disease have poor outcomes despite multimodality management. Non-availability of N-MYC testing in few patients could have falsely down-staged them to IR from HR. A low hemoglobin at diagnosis is a poor predictor of outcome.

Indexed as

Tertiary Care CentersAdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHemoglobinsHumansIndiaInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeuroblastomaRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsHemoglobinsNeuroblastomaPediatric cancerTransplant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.