ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2019
Physical Exercise and Epigenetic Modifications in Skeletal Muscle.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Molecular Effects of Physical Activity and Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of genomic variants in power and endurance sports to decode the impact of genomics on athletic performance and success.Human genomics · 2024Pooled it
- Maternal Exercise Impacts Offspring Metabolic Health in Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- Genetics and athletic performance: a systematic SWOT analysis of non-systematic reviews.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating Klotho as an emerging exerkine.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Muscle-strengthening activities are associated with lower risk and mortality in major non-communicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of physical activity on the risk of frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Whether or Not the Effects ofNutrients · 2020Pooled it
- Epigenetic changes in healthy human skeletal muscle following exercise- a systematic review.Epigenetics · 2019Pooled it
- Betaine Supplementation Improves 60 km Cycling Time Trial Performance and One-Carbon Metabolism in Cyclists During Recovery.Nutrients · 2025Trial
- Comparative effects of aerobic exercise in early versus late middle age on skeletal muscle function and miRNA profiling in mice.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Effects of exercise‑derived extracellular vesicles: Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms and protective roles (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The Role of Exercise in Regulating Histone Modifications and Non-coding RNAs in Muscle Aging and Sarcopenia.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- Association Between Physical Activity and Mortality in Men with or at Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Kiss1-FASN participates fatty acid synthesis via high-fat diet in PgVAT of female mice.Journal of lipid research · 2026Article
- Multi-Omic, Multi-Tissue Responses to Acute Exercise in Sedentary Adults: Findings from the Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Epigenetically Active Supplements and the Risk of Sports Injuries: Narrative Review from Molecular Mechanisms to Practical Implications.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Integrated analysis of DNA methylome and transcriptome of the backfat and longissimus dorsi muscle of Chinese-European hybrid pigs.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Lifelong football training influences miR-1303 serum expression and human breast cancer MCF-7 cells motility: a pilot study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical activity and sports play major roles in the overall health status of humans. It is well known that regular exercise helps to lower the risk for a broad variety of health problems, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. Being physically active induces a wide variety of molecular adaptations, for example fiber type switches or other metabolic alterations, in skeletal muscle tissue. These adaptations are based on exercise-induced changes to the skeletal muscle transcriptome. Understanding their nature is crucial to improve the development of exercise-based therapeutic strategies. Recent research indicates that specifically epigenetic mechanisms, i.e., pathways that induce changes in gene expression patterns without altering the DNA base sequence, might play a major role in controlling skeletal muscle transcriptional patterns. Epigenetic mechanisms include DNA and histone modifications, as well as expression of specific microRNAs. They can be modulated by environmental factors or external stimuli, such as exercise, and eventually induce specific and fine-tuned changes to the transcriptional response. In this review, we highlight current knowledge on epigenetic changes induced in exercising skeletal muscle, their target genes, and resulting phenotypic changes. In addition, we raise the question of whether epigenetic modifications might serve as markers for the design and management of optimized and individualized training protocols, as prognostic tools to predict training adaptation, or even as targets for the design of "exercise mimics".
Indexed as
Identifiers
30778851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.