Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30778845›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2019

The Effectiveness and Safety of Barbed Sutures in the Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Yifei Lin, Youlin Long, Sike Lai, Yonggang Zhang, Qiong Guo, Jin Huang, Liang Du

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in adoption of knotless tissue control devices in robotic surgery.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yifei LinUrology Department, Institute of Urology, Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Youlin LongChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Sike LaiWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yonggang ZhangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Qiong GuoChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Jin HuangUrology Department, Institute of Urology, Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. michael_huangjin@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7160-2314
Liang DuChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China. 125798620@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnotless barbed sutures can eliminate knot tying during the bariatric surgery (BS). Since effects reported on patients and surgeons are ambiguous, this study is determined to identify the effectiveness and safety of knotless barbed suture in BS.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Clinical Studies, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures in BS (until July 2, 2018). Quality assessment was conducted due to Cochrane's recommendations. Review Manager was applied to analyze the data, and we performed subgroup analyses based on study design type and surgery type.

resultsA total of four cohort studies (25,505 patients, low to moderate risk of bias) and four RCTs (1480 patients, low to moderate risk of bias) proved eligible. BS includes laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Comparing to conventional suture, pooling data showed that suture time (MD = - 4.87, 95%CI - 8.82 to - 0.92, P = 0.02) and operative time (MD = - 7.88, 95%CI - 14.10 to - 1.67, P = 0.01) declined significantly in the barbed group. Although no significant change was in the overall postoperative complications and hospital stay, subgroup analysis of RCTs suggested that significantly, fewer bleeding conditions happened in barbed groups.

conclusionsAlthough quality of all the studies was relatively moderate and the number of the included studies was limited, the barbed suture may have the potentiality to be an effective and reliable technique and extend the application in other bariatric surgeries. More evidence with randomized design, larger sample sizes, and longer follow-up need to compel validations of this state-of-the-art in the future.

Indexed as

SuturesBariatric SurgeryHumansObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsSuture TechniquesBarbed sutureBariatric surgerySurgical techniqueSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.