Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30778733›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in patients with low grade and anaplastic glioma after long-term seizure freedom: a prospective observational study.

M Kerkhof, J A F Koekkoek, M J Vos, M J van den Bent, W Taal, T J Postma, J E C Bromberg, M C M Kouwenhoven, L Dirven, J C Reijneveld and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Patient-Centered Management of Brain Tumor-Related Epilepsy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Medical and Neurological Management of Brain Tumor Complications.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neurological and Medical Complications in Brain Tumor Patients.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M KerkhofDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 2191, 2501 VC, The Hague, The Netherlands. m.kerkhof@haaglandenmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1875-9387
J A F KoekkoekDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 2191, 2501 VC, The Hague, The Netherlands.
M J VosDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 2191, 2501 VC, The Hague, The Netherlands.
M J van den BentBrain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W TaalBrain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
T J PostmaBrain Tumor Center Amsterdam at VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J E C BrombergBrain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M C M KouwenhovenBrain Tumor Center Amsterdam at VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L DirvenDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 2191, 2501 VC, The Hague, The Netherlands.
J C ReijneveldBrain Tumor Center Amsterdam at VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J B TaphoornDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 2191, 2501 VC, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen glioma patients experience long-term seizure freedom the question arises whether antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be continued. As no prospective studies exist on seizure recurrence in glioma patients after AED withdrawal, we evaluated the decision-making process to withdraw AEDs in glioma patients, and seizure outcome after withdrawal.

methodsPatients with a histologically confirmed low grade or anaplastic glioma were included. Eligible patients were seizure free ≥ 1 year from the date of last antitumor treatment, or ≥ 2 years since the last seizure when seizures occurred after the end of the last antitumor treatment. Patients and neuro-oncologists made a shared decision on the preferred AED treatment (i.e. AED withdrawal or continuation). Primary outcomes were: (1) outcome of the shared decision-making process and (2) rate of seizure recurrence.

resultsEighty-three patients fulfilled all eligibility criteria. However, in 12/83 (14%) patients, the neuro-oncologist had serious objections to AED withdrawal. Therefore, 71/83 (86%) patients were analyzed; In 46/71 (65%) patients it was decided to withdraw AED treatment. In the withdrawal group, 26% (12/46) had seizure recurrence during follow-up. Seven of these 12 patients (58%) had tumor progression, of which three within 3 months after seizure recurrence. In the AED continuation group, 8% (2/25) of patients had seizure recurrence of which one had tumor progression.

conclusionIn 65% of patients a shared decision was made to withdraw AEDs, of which 26% had seizure recurrence. AED withdrawal should only be considered in carefully selected patients with a presumed low risk of tumor progression.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticonvulsantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesRecurrenceResearch DesignSeizuresTime FactorsWithholding TreatmentAnticonvulsantsAntiepileptic drugsEpilepsyGliomaWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID30778733
PMCPMC6478626
OpenAlexW2917627226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.