ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2019
Association between dipsacus saponin VI level and diversity of endophytic fungi in roots of Dipsacus asperoides.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress on chemical metabolites, processing technologies, and pharmacological activities of asperosaponin VI: a systematic review and critical evaluation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Shaping of the core microbiome by ginsenosides in American ginseng across diverse habitats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diversity of cultivable endophytic fungi in a decumbent subshrub endemic of the Brazilian tropical savanna.Folia microbiologica · 2025Article
- High-throughput sequencing-based analysis of the composition and diversity of the endophytic bacterial community in the roots of3 Biotech · 2024Article
- Advances in the beneficial endophytic fungi for the growth and health of woody plants.Forestry research · 2024Review
- Methods used for the study of endophytic fungi: a review on methodologies and challenges, and associated tips.Archives of microbiology · 2022Review
- Endophytic Fungi Isolated fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Endophytic Fungal Composition ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Illumina-based analysis yields new insights into the diversity and composition of endophytic fungi in cultivated Huperzia serrata.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dipsacus asperoides contains multiple pharmacologically active compounds. The principal are saponins. The plant can be cultivated, but it contains lower levels of bioactive compounds than the plant in the wild. It may be the reason to exploit the endophytic fungi that colonize the plant roots in order to produce bioactive compounds. However, the endophytic fungi of D. asperoides have not been analyzed in detail. In this study, we isolated and identified 46 endophytic fungal strains from the taproots, lateral roots and leaves, and we used morphological and molecular biological methods to assign them into 15 genera: Fusarium sp., Ceratobasidium sp., Chaetomium sp., Penicillium sp., Aspergillus sp., Talaromyces sp., Cladosporium sp., Bionectria sp., Mucor sp., Trichoderma sp., Myrothecium sp., Clonostachys sp., Ijuhya sp., Leptosphaeria sp. and Phoma sp. Taproots contained abundant endophytic fungi, the numbers of which correlated positively with level of dipsacus saponin VI. Primary fermentation of several endophytic fungal strains from taproots showed that Fusarium, Leptosphaeria, Ceratobasidium sp. and Phoma sp. can produce the triterpenoid saponin. These results may guide efforts to sustainably produce bioactive compounds from D. asperoides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.