ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2019
[Chronic pain and society : Sociological analysis of a complex interconnection].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissemination of Pediatric Chronic Pain Research: Views from Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Professionals.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Transforming Chronic Pain Care Through Telemedicine: An Italian Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Impact of the pandemic on hospital care for chronic pain patients in Germany.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Chronic pain as a blind spot in the diagnosis of a depressed society. On the implications of the connection between depression and chronic pain for interpretations of contemporary society.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2022Article
- Determining the Influencing Factors on Acceptance of eHealth Pain Management Interventions Among Patients With Chronic Pain Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- [Chronic pain and society].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current debate about the interconnection between chronic pain and society is economically narrowed. This involves the threat of losing sight of the fact that the interconnection between society and chronic pain is a complex entanglement that goes beyond economic costs. This article addresses the mentioned entanglement by acknowledging the following four levels of society: (1) the social structure, (2) the way of life, with special reference to occupation and its counterpart, leisure time, (3) the (normative) interpretation patterns of chronic pain and (4) the treatment situation. The applied sociological perspective shows that society, and this also includes medicine, is more than a mere addressee of problems. Society has to be considered as an influencing factor with respect to the development and stabilization of chronic pain. The outlined broadening of the perspective should contribute to a better understanding of the societal impact on chronic pain in order to stimulate an improvement in care and possibly a long-term reduction in costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30778683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.