ArticleCurrent microbiology2019
A Preliminary Study on Probiotic Characteristics of Sporosarcina spp. for Poultry Applications.
Article in Current microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond metagenomics: culturomics uncovers aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacterial diversity in the camel gut.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Characterization and Draft Genome Sequence Analyses of Two Novel Endospore-FormingMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Temporal Variations in the Gut Microbiota of the Globally Endangered Sichuan Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus): Implications for Adaptation to Seasonal Dietary Change and Conservation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Taxonomic and genomic characterization of Sporosarcina cyprini sp. nov., moderately tolerant of CrAntonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Microencapsulated Essential Oils in Broilers Challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis: A Focus on the Body's Antioxidant Status, Gut Microbiology, and Morphology.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Fecal Microbiota of Relict Gull (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Amelioration of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Ileal and cecal microbiota response toFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Novel Insights for Metabiotics Production by Using Artisanal Probiotic Cultures.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Probiotic Validation of a Non-native, Thermostable, Phytase-Producing Bacterium: Streptococcus thermophilus.Current microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Probiotics are well known for their wide range of beneficial activities. However, recent use of probiotic Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus spp. has been plagued by certain disadvantages such as complex growth requirements, high maintenance cost, susceptibility to the gastrointestinal environment, pathogenic gene transfer, non-standardized dosage, cell lysis at extreme acidic pH, widespread antibiotic resistance, and lower bacterial viability due to the lack of spore formation. Therefore, spore-forming bacteria belonging to Sporosarcina genus such as pasteurii, globispora, and psychrophila were assessed for probiotic characteristics such as biofilm formation, intestinal adhesion, acid and bile tolerance, antibiotic sensitivity, and anti-pathogenic activity. This ensures bacterial viability under gastrointestinal conditions and enabled the same to colonize effectively in the intestinal lumen (in vitro). The bacterial cell counts ranging from 6.59 to 6.91 log(CFU/mL) was observed for Sporosarcina spp. after 16 h. This indicated that there is no significant difference in the cell counts (P-value = 0.90). The cell counts of Sporosarcina spp. ranging from 5.57 to 5.93 log(CFU/mL) displayed strong acid tolerance at pH 2. They were also viable at higher bile (0.5%) concentration. Among the Sporosarcina spp., pasteurii showed better tolerance (6.90 log(CFU/mL)) even after 16 h. Among the selected bacteria, Sporosarcina psychrophila was more susceptible to teicoplanin and meropenem with an inhibition zone of 30 mm. Maximum antagonistic activity was observed against Serratia marcescens (with inhibition zone up to 15 mm). Our results suggest that bacteria belonging to Sporosarcina genus possess all the required characteristics to be used as potential poultry probiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.