ArticleIntensive care medicine2019
De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy in critically ill hematology patients: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Analysis of Missed Antibiotic De-Escalation Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- ICU-acquired infections in immunocompromised patients.Intensive care medicine · 2024Review
- Effect of antimicrobial de-escalation strategy on 14-day mortality among intensive care unit patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study with inverse probability-of-treatment weighting.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Antibiotic De-escalation Experience in the Setting of Emergency Department: A Retrospective, Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Blood Stream Infections from MDR Bacteria.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Antimicrobial de-escalation is part of appropriate antibiotic usage in ICU.Intensive care medicine · 2020Article
- Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement.Intensive care medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30778647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.