Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30778634›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019

High-throughput phenotyping platforms enhance genomic selection for wheat grain yield across populations and cycles in early stage.

Jin Sun, Jesse A Poland, Suchismita Mondal, José Crossa, Philomin Juliana, Ravi P Singh, Jessica E Rutkoski, Jean-Luc Jannink, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Govindan Velu and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. 110 years of rice breeding at LSU: realized genetic gains and future optimization.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jin SunPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jesse A PolandDepartment of Plant Pathology and Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Suchismita MondalInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, CP, Mexico.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, CP, Mexico.
Philomin JulianaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, CP, Mexico.
Ravi P SinghInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, CP, Mexico.
Jessica E RutkoskiPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jean-Luc JanninkPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, CP, Mexico.
Govindan VeluInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, CP, Mexico.
Julio Huerta-EspinoCampo Experimental Valle de México INIFAP, Apdo. Postal 10, 56230, Chapingo, Edo. de México, Mexico.
Mark E SorrellsPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. mes12@cornell.edu.

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants 2011-68002-30029Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP113319Hatch project 149-430United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-13-00051USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67007-25939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) models have been validated for many quantitative traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding. However, those models are mostly constrained within the same growing cycle and the extension of GS to the case of across cycles has been a challenge, mainly due to the low predictive accuracy resulting from two factors: reduced genetic relationships between different families and augmented environmental variances between cycles. Using the data collected from diverse field conditions at the International Wheat and Maize Improvement Center, we evaluated GS for grain yield in three elite yield trials across three wheat growing cycles. The objective of this project was to employ the secondary traits, canopy temperature, and green normalized difference vegetation index, which are closely associated with grain yield from high-throughput phenotyping platforms, to improve prediction accuracy for grain yield. The ability to predict grain yield was evaluated reciprocally across three cycles with or without secondary traits. Our results indicate that prediction accuracy increased by an average of 146% for grain yield across cycles with secondary traits. In addition, our results suggest that secondary traits phenotyped during wheat heading and early grain filling stages were optimal for enhancing the prediction accuracy for grain yield.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenome, PlantSelection, GeneticGenetic MarkersGenomicsPhenotypePlant BreedingTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.