Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019
Monitoring of tobramycin serum concentrations in selected critically ill patients receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract: a retrospective evaluation.
Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective digestive decontamination.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- The Relationship between Selective Digestive Decontamination and Nosocomial Infections in Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in ICUs: A Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- PBPK Modeling and Simulation of Antibiotics Amikacin, Gentamicin, Tobramycin, and Vancomycin Used in Hospital Practice.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Selective Intestinal Decontamination as a Method for Preventing Infectious Complications (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) is a strategy in mechanically ventilated patients to reduce mortality. Treatment consists of enterally administered non-absorbable antibiotics, i.e., tobramycin. However, most intensive care unit (ICU) patients with SDD appear to have detectable tobramycin serum concentrations. The Rijnstate Hospital implemented a protocol for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of tobramycin in patients at risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity of TDM in these patients and to optimize the current protocol.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included ICU patients with SDD treatment for ≥ 7 days and renal failure. These patients were considered eligible for monitoring of tobramycin. Tobramycin serum concentrations, relevant laboratory parameters (i.e., renal function, lactate), and patient data were extracted from the National Intensive Care Evaluation database and the hospital electronic patient data system.
resultsIn 23 subjects, a total of 43 tobramycin serum concentrations was determined. The median tobramycin serum concentration was 0.33 (IQR 0.17-0.49) mg/L of which 12 (27.9%) samples had concentrations < 0.2 mg/L, 30 (69.8%) had concentrations 0.2-1.0 mg/L and 1 (2.3%) had a toxic concentration > 1.0 mg/L. In 3 (7.0%) cases, an intervention was conducted based on the tobramycin serum concentration.
conclusionThe majority (83.7%) of samples had detectable tobramycin serum concentrations. Monitoring of tobramycin serum concentrations can be considered necessary in patients at risk. However, the current protocol should be optimized to intercept patients more precise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.