ReviewDer Internist2019
[Modern HIV treatment].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Presentations for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in emergency departments: guideline and recommendations].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024Guideline
- Antiretroviral Therapy-Induced Dysregulation of Gene Expression and Lipid Metabolism in HIV+ Patients: Beneficial Role of Antioxidant Phytochemicals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- [Antiviral drugs : Potent agents, promising therapies for COVID‑19 and therapeutic limitations].Der Internist · 2022Review
- Rotator cuff repair in HIV-positive patients ages 65 and older: only slight increase in risk of general postoperative surgical complications.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- Low Frequency of Integrase Inhibitor Resistance Mutations Among Therapy-Naïve HIV Patients in Southeast China.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become a chronic disease with a favourable prognosis if adequate antiretroviral therapy (ART) is applied. Therefore, each patient with HIV infection should be treated irrespectively of clinical symptoms or of immunological status. A combination of three active drugs that have to be taken life-long has been standard for many years. The regimen contains two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus either an integrase inhibitor, a boosted protease inhibitor, or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Integrase inhibitors are recommended as the third partner of choice by recent guidelines due to their high efficacy and their favourable safety profile. Many combination drugs are now available which allow a simple treatment with few tablets and in many instances a one-pill combination per day is an option. Potential interactions with drugs given for other diseases have to be taken into account, especially if a pharmacological booster is part of the regimen. Combination therapy should be changed if either virological failure (HIV RNA >200 copies/ml) or drug-related adverse events occur. In special situations (e. g. pregnancy) highly experienced experts in the field should be consulted. Novel approaches for HIV therapy include dual therapy as well as treatment with long-acting substances. Beside therapy, antiretroviral drugs are used for prevention either as post-exposure prophylaxis or as pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30778612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.