Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30778236›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2019

Dynamic reorganization of the genome shapes the recombination landscape in meiotic prophase.

Lucas Patel, Rhea Kang, Scott C Rosenberg, Yunjiang Qiu, Ramya Raviram, Sora Chee, Rong Hu, Bing Ren, Francesca Cole, Kevin D Corbett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Unusual RNA polymerase II patterns in meiotic prophase I inTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lucas PatelDepartment of Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8607-2782
Rhea KangDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX, USA.
Scott C RosenbergLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Yunjiang QiuBioinformatics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0539-9714
Ramya RaviramLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sora CheeLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Rong HuLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Bing RenLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-1127
Francesca ColeDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX, USA. fcole@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-2363
Kevin D CorbettLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA, USA. kcorbett@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5854-2388

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Contemporary Approaches to Cancer Cell Signaling and CommunicationT32CA009523 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DONOGHUE, DANIEL J, YANG, JING · 1985 to 2025
$12.1M
Molecular mechanisms of chromosome organization and recombination control by the meiotic chromosome axis.R01GM104141 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CORBETT, KEVIN DANIEL · 2013 to 2021
$3.1M
Mechanistic derivation of germ line mutation by genome-wide mouse tetrad analysisDP2HD087943 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI COLE, FRANCESCA · 2015 to 2015
$2.4M
Regulation of Receptor Tyrosine KinasesR01GM065490 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI DONOGHUE, DANIEL J · 2002 to 2005
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009523NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD087943NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065490NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In meiotic prophase, chromosomes are organized into compacted loop arrays to promote homolog pairing and recombination. Here, we probe the architecture of the mouse spermatocyte genome in early and late meiotic prophase using chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C). Our data support the established loop array model of meiotic chromosomes, and infer loops averaging 0.8-1.0 megabase pairs (Mb) in early prophase and extending to 1.5-2.0 Mb in late prophase as chromosomes compact and homologs undergo synapsis. Topologically associating domains (TADs) are lost in meiotic prophase, suggesting that assembly of the meiotic chromosome axis alters the activity of chromosome-associated cohesin complexes. While TADs are lost, physically separated A and B compartments are maintained in meiotic prophase. Moreover, meiotic DNA breaks and interhomolog crossovers preferentially form in the gene-dense A compartment, revealing a role for chromatin organization in meiotic recombination. Finally, direct detection of interhomolog contacts genome-wide reveals the structural basis for homolog alignment and juxtaposition by the synaptonemal complex.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinChromosome PairingChromosomesDNA BreaksGenomeHomologous RecombinationMaleMeiotic Prophase IMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSpermatocytesSpermatogenesisSynaptonemal ComplexChromatin

Identifiers

PMID30778236
PMCPMC6403010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.