Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30778155›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

The Endobiota Study: Comparison of Vaginal, Cervical and Gut Microbiota Between Women with Stage 3/4 Endometriosis and Healthy Controls.

Baris Ata, Sule Yildiz, Engin Turkgeldi, Vicente Pérez Brocal, Ener Cagri Dinleyici, Andrés Moya, Bulent Urman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Baris AtaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. barisata@ku.edu.tr.
Sule YildizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4803-7043
Engin TurkgeldiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Vicente Pérez BrocalÁrea de Genómica y Salud, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Salud Pública), Valencia, Spain.
Ener Cagri DinleyiciEskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Andrés MoyaÁrea de Genómica y Salud, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Salud Pública), Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2867-1119
Bulent UrmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Koç University · TRFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESEskişehir Osmangazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysbiosis in the genital tract or gut microbiome can be associated with endometriosis. We sampled vaginal, cervical and gut microbiota from 14 women with histology proven stage 3/4 endometriosis and 14 healthy controls. The V3 and V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified following the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation. Despite overall similar vaginal, cervical and intestinal microbiota composition between stage 3/4 endometriosis group and controls, we observed differences at genus level. The complete absence of Atopobium in the vaginal and cervical microbiota of the stage 3/4 endometriosis group was noteworthy. In the cervical microbiota, Gardnerella, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Shigella, and Ureoplasma, all of which contain potentially pathogenic species, were increased in stage 3/4 endometriosis. More women in the stage 3/4 endometriosis group had Shigella/Escherichia dominant stool microbiome. Further studies can clarify whether the association is causal, and whether dysbiosis leads to endometriosis or endometriosis leads to dysbiosis.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAdultCase-Control StudiesCervix UteriEndometriosisFemaleHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsSeverity of Illness IndexVaginaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30778155
PMCPMC6379373
OpenAlexW2912182143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.