Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30777977›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2019

Silvia Olivia Salceanu, Dina Hamada, Ramona Gabriela Ursu, Ahmed Abdelwahab Saad

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Silvia Olivia SalceanuDepartment of Ophthalmology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Dina HamadaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zagazig University, Egypt.
Ramona Gabriela UrsuDepartment of Microbiology, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Ahmed Abdelwahab SaadDepartment of Ophthalmology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology, Zagazig University, Egypt.
James Cook University Hospital · GBGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a unique case of endophthalmitis with Staphylococcus lugdunensis following dexamethasone intravitreal implant for branch retinal vein occlusion associated with cystoid macular edema. Patient did not show favorable clinical response after vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotics; so, we decided to repeat vitrectomy, remove the steroid implant and fill the eye with silicon oil, and repeat intravitreal vancomycin. Vision has improved from hand movements at presentation to counting fingers at 1.5 m after second vitrectomy and final visual acuity 3 months later after silicon oil removal was 6/36.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsEndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialGlucocorticoidsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRetinal Vein OcclusionSlit Lamp MicroscopyStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus lugdunensisTomography, Optical CoherenceDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsDexamethasone implantendophthalmitissilicon oilStaphylococcus lugdunensis

Identifiers

PMID30777977
PMCPMC6407396
OpenAlexW2916174263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.