Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019
A Mobile Phone-Based Self-Monitoring Tool for Perioperative Gastric Cancer Patients With Incentive Spirometer: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of the Mobile Self-input Tool of Incentive Spirometer on Its Usage by Patients : a Randomized Clinical Trial
Effects of Resistive Diaphragmatic Training on Pulmonary Functions in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development, Usability, and Quality Evaluation of a Mobile Application to Enhance the Functional Aspects of Social Relationships Among Cancer Patients: An Applied-Developmental Mixed-Methods Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Clinical and economic impact of digital dashboards on hospital inpatient care: a systematic review.JAMIA open · 2025Review
- A systematic review of the impacts of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions on safety, adherence, quality-of-life and cost-related outcomes.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Development, usability and quality evaluation of the resilient mobile application for women with breast cancer.Health science reports · 2022Article
- What Works Best to Engage Participants in Mobile App Interventions and e-Health: A Scoping Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022Article
- Mobile Applications in Clinical and Perioperative Care for Anesthesia: Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- The impact of new modes of electronic communication in the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Data requirements of an informative, directive, and preventive mobile health application for gastric cancer.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn incentive spirometer (IS) is a medical device used to help patients improve the functioning of their lungs. It is provided to patients who have had any surgery that might jeopardize respiratory function. An incentive spirometer plays a key role in the prevention of postoperative complications, and the appropriate use of an IS is especially well known for the prevention of respiratory complications. However, IS utilization depends on the patient's engagement, and information and communication technology (ICT) can help in this area.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the effect of mobile ICT on the usage of an IS (Go-breath) app by postoperative patients after general anesthesia.
methodsFor this study, we recruited patients from April to May 2018, who used the Go-breath app at a single tertiary hospital in South Korea. The patients were randomly classified into either a test or control group. The main function of the Go-breath app was to allow for self-reporting and frequency monitoring of IS use, deep breathing, and active coughing in real time. The Go-breath app was identical for both the test and control groups, except for the presence of the alarm function. The test group heard an alarm every 60 min from 9 am to 9 pm for 2 days. For the test group alone, a dashboard was established in the nurse's station through which a nurse could rapidly assess the performance of multiple patients. To evaluate the number of performances per group, we constructed an incentive spirometer index (ISI).
resultsA total of 44 patients were recruited, and 42 of them completed the study protocol. ISI in the test group was 20.2 points higher than that in the control group (113.5 points in the test group and 93.2 points in the control group, P=.22). The system usability scale generally showed almost the same score in the 2 groups (79.3 points in the test group and 79.4 points in the control group, P=.94). We observed that the performance rates of IS count, active coughing, and deep breathing were also higher in the test group but with no statistically significant difference between the groups. For the usefulness "yes or no" question, over 90% (38/42) of patients answered "yes" and wanted more functional options and information.
conclusionsThe use of the Go-breath app resulted in considerable differences between the test group and control group but with no statistically significant differences.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03569332; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03569332 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74ihKmQIX).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.