Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30777157›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2019

Differences in Prenatal Care by Presence and Type of Maternal Disability.

Willi Horner-Johnson, Frances M Biel, Aaron B Caughey, Blair G Darney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Birth intentions among US fathers with disabilities.Disability and health journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Willi Horner-JohnsonInstitute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: hornerjo@ohsu.edu.
Frances M BielDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Aaron B CaugheyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Blair G DarneyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Oregon Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 ProgramK12HS022981 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
Prevalence and outcomes of pregnancy in women with disabilitiesR21HD081309 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HORNER-JOHNSON, WILLI · 2014 to 2015
$419k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD081309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrior studies have found that women with disabilities are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care than women without disabilities. However, little is known about differences in patterns of prenatal care by type of disability. Therefore, this study examined timing and frequency of prenatal care among women with physical, sensory, or intellectual/developmental disabilities compared with women without disabilities.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using linked maternal and infant hospital discharge and birth certificate data for all births in California in 2000-2012 (N=6,745,201). Analyses were conducted in 2017-2018. Modified Poisson regression analyses compared women with each type of disability with women without disabilities on trimester of prenatal care initiation and number of prenatal care visits.

resultsWomen with intellectual/developmental disabilities or with limited hearing had significantly higher RR of delaying prenatal care initiation until the second or third trimester (intellectual/developmental disabilities: adjusted RR=1.21, 95% CI=1.09, 1.33; hearing: adjusted RR=1.11, 95% CI=1.02, 1.21), whereas women with physical disabilities and limited vision had lower risk of delaying care (physical: adjusted RR=0.91, 95% CI=0.88, 0.94; vision: adjusted RR=0.85, 95% CI=0.73, 0.99). Women with limited hearing or vision or intellectual/developmental disabilities had higher risk of receiving fewer prenatal visits than recommended, compared with women without disabilities. Women with physical disabilities or intellectual/developmental disabilities had higher RR of receiving more than the typical number of visits.

conclusionsThere were key differences in prenatal care utilization by disability type, reflective of particularly pronounced disparities for women with intellectual/developmental disabilities and women with limited hearing. Delays in receipt of prenatal care and low numbers of prenatal care visits may contribute to the poorer birth outcomes that have been observed previously in these groups. Targeted interventions are needed to improve uptake of prenatal care in these vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCaliforniaFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePersons with DisabilitiesPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesPersons with Intellectual DisabilitiesPersons with Visual DisabilitiesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID30777157
PMCPMC6402767
OpenAlexW2913150842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.