Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30777034›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Health care waste management among health workers and associated factors in primary health care facilities in Kampala City, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

Solomon Tsebeni Wafula, Julian Musiime, Frederick Oporia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Determinants of access to waste management services in healthcare facilities in 14 low- and middle-income countries.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Healthcare Waste-A Serious Problem for Global Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances and challenges in recycling and reusing biomedical materials.Current opinion in green and sustainable chemistry · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Solomon Tsebeni WafulaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Makerere University, P.o Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. swafula@musph.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-015X
Julian MusiimeInternational Health Sciences University (IHSU), Kampala, Uganda.
Frederick OporiaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Makerere University, P.o Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGClarke International University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare wastes (HCWs) are one of the most hazardous wastes globally; second to only radiation waste. HCW management needs to be prioritized because of the devastating effects on human health and environment if not well managed. Health workers play a crucial role in management of HCWs. This study investigated the management of HCWs among health workers and associated factors in primary health care facilities in Kampala City, Uganda.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional health facility survey in 8 primary health care facilities in Kampala City from March to April 2017. We interviewed health workers who provided data on socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes and practices on HCW management. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used as a measure of association between HCW management and associated factors. The PRs were obtained using a multivariable modified Poisson regression using a generalized linear model of Poisson family with a logarithm as the canonical link function, with robust standard errors while applying a forward elimination method.

resultsA total of 200 health workers responded to the survey; Knowledge of HCW management  was high 143 (71.5%, 95% CI (65.2-77.8)). About 160 (80.0%) wore appropriate personal protective wear when handling HCWs. Overall, 148 (74.0%, 95% CI (67.8-80.1) had satisfactory HCW management practices. Health workers with diploma education (Adjusted PR = 1.49, 95% CI (1.13-1.96), working in the teenage corner (Adjusted PR = 1.10, 95% CI (1.01-1.29), previous training on HCW management (Adjusted PR = 1.19, 95% CI (1.01-1.42) and those who thought HCW management was important (Adjusted PR = 2.81, 95% CI (1.22-6.47) were more likely to have satisfactory HCW management practices.

conclusionThe practices of health workers on HCW management were largely satisfactory. Higher odds of HCW management were determined among health workers with diploma education, previous HCW management trainings and among those who perceived HCW management as important. There is need to organize HCW management trainings in order to improve their HCW management practices among health workers.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHazardous WasteHealth PersonnelHealth WorkforceHumansMalePrimary Health CareUgandaWaste ManagementHazardous WasteHealthcare wasteHealthcare workersKampalaPrimary health care facilitiesUgandaWaste management

Identifiers

PMID30777034
PMCPMC6380052
OpenAlexW2939076497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.