Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30777030›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Identifying cancer prognostic modules by module network analysis.

Xiong-Hui Zhou, Xin-Yi Chu, Gang Xue, Jiang-Hui Xiong, Hong-Yu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GETdb: A comprehensive database for genetic and evolutionary features of drug targets.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  2. Non-Coding RNAs Extended Omnigenic Module of Cancers.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiong-Hui ZhouHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Xin-Yi ChuHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Gang XueHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Jiang-Hui XiongState Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Yu ZhangHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China. zhy630@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2662017PY115Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2662018PY023National Instrumentaion Program 2013YQ19046707National Natural Science Foundation of China 61602201Shenzhen Science & Technology Program JCYJ20151029154245758, CKFW2016082915204709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of prognostic genes that can distinguish the prognostic risks of cancer patients remains a significant challenge. Previous works have proven that functional gene sets were more reliable for this task than the gene signature. However, few works have considered the cross-talk among functional gene sets, which may result in neglecting important prognostic gene sets for cancer.

resultsHere, we proposed a new method that considers both the interactions among modules and the prognostic correlation of the modules to identify prognostic modules in cancers. First, dense sub-networks in the gene co-expression network of cancer patients were detected. Second, cross-talk between every two modules was identified by a permutation test, thus generating the module network. Third, the prognostic correlation of each module was evaluated by the resampling method. Then, the GeneRank algorithm, which takes the module network and the prognostic correlations of all the modules as input, was applied to prioritize the prognostic modules. Finally, the selected modules were validated by survival analysis in various data sets. Our method was applied in three kinds of cancers, and the results show that our method succeeded in identifying prognostic modules in all the three cancers. In addition, our method outperformed state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, the selected modules were significantly enriched with known cancer-related genes and drug targets of cancer, which may indicate that the genes involved in the modules may be drug targets for therapy.

conclusionsWe proposed a useful method to identify key modules in cancer prognosis and our prognostic genes may be good candidates for drug targets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansNeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival AnalysisCancer prognosisDrug targetsGeneRankModule network

Identifiers

PMID30777030
PMCPMC6380061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.