Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30776911›Full record

Trial reportAIDS care2019

Ancillary service needs among persons new to HIV care and the relationship between needs and late presentation to care.

Anne K Monroe, Catherine R Lesko, Geetanjali Chander, Bryan Lau, Jeanne Keruly, Heidi M Crane, K Rivet Amico, Sonia Napravnik, E Byrd Quinlivan, Michael J Mugavero

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne K Monroea Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3201-3845
Catherine R Leskoc Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Geetanjali Chandera Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Bryan Lauc Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Jeanne Kerulyd Adult Ryan White Services , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Heidi M Cranee Harborview Medical Center , University of Washington , Seattle , WA , USA.
K Rivet Amicof Department of Health Behavior and Health Education , School of Public Health, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-6934
Sonia Napravnikg School of Medicine , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
E Byrd Quinlivanh Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1213-8707
Michael J Mugaveroi Division of Infectious Diseases , University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) , Birmingham , AL , USA.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Judith Tsui · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Integrating ENGagement and Adherence Goals Upon Entry iENGAGE to Control HIVR01AI103661 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MUGAVERO, MICHAEL J · 2012 to 2016
$4.0M
Leveraging Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve Retention in HIV CareK23MH105284 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MONROE, ANNE KRESS · 2014 to 2016
$525k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI103661NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH105284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancillary service needs likely influence time to diagnosis and presentation for HIV care. The effect of both met and unmet needs on late presentation to HIV care is not well understood. We used baseline data from 348 people with HIV (PWH) with no prior HIV care who enrolled in iENGAGE (a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention to support retention in care) at one of four HIV clinics in the US. A standardized baseline questionnaire collected information on ancillary service needs, and whether each need was presently unmet. We examined covariates known to be associated with disease stage at presentation to care and their association with needs. We subsequently assessed the relationship of needs with CD4 accounting for those other covariates by estimating prevalence ratios (PR) using inverse probability weights. Most patients enrolling in the RCT were male (79%) and the majority were Black (62%); median age was 34 years. Prevalence of any reported individual need was 69%. One-third of the sample had a baseline CD4 cell count <200, 42% between 200 and 499 and 27% ≥500. There was no statistically significant association between need or unmet need and baseline CD4. In general, psychiatric health and SU issues (depression, anxiety, and drug use) were consistently associated with higher prevalence of need (met and unmet). Additionally, the Black race was associated with higher basic resource needs (housing: PR 1.67, 95%CI 1.08-2.59; transportation: PR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12-2.45). Ancillary service needs (met and unmet) were common among patients new to HIV care and impacted vulnerable subgroups. However, we found no evidence that reporting a specific individual need, whether met or unmet, was associated with a timely presentation to HIV care. The impact of needs on subsequent steps of the HIV care continuum will be examined with longitudinal data.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHIV InfectionsHousingHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTransportationUnited StatesneedsRetentiontreatment naive

Identifiers

PMID30776911
PMCPMC7328012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.