Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30776529›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Distinct visuo-motor brain dynamics for real-world objects versus planar images.

Francesco Marini, Katherine A Breeding, Jacqueline C Snow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Using Extended Reality to Study the Experience of Presence.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco MariniDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV, 89557-0296, USA; Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0559, USA. Electronic address: francesco.pd@gmail.com.
Katherine A BreedingDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV, 89557-0296, USA.
Jacqueline C SnowDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV, 89557-0296, USA. Electronic address: snow@unr.edu.

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Bringing the Real-World into Cognitive Neuroscience: From Images to Real ObjectsR01EY026701 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jacqueline C Walsh-Snow · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026701NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultimately, we aim to generalize and translate scientific knowledge to the real world, yet current understanding of human visual perception is based predominantly on studies of two-dimensional (2-D) images. Recent cognitive-behavioral evidence shows that real objects are processed differently to images, although the neural processes that underlie these differences are unknown. Because real objects (unlike images) afford actions, they may trigger stronger or more prolonged activation in neural populations for visuo-motor action planning. Here, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) when human observers viewed real-world three-dimensional (3-D) objects or closely matched 2-D images of the same items. Although responses to real objects and images were similar overall, there were critical differences. Compared to images, viewing real objects triggered stronger and more sustained event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the μ frequency band (8-13 Hz) - a neural signature of automatic motor preparation. Event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a transient, early occipital negativity for real objects (versus images), likely reflecting 3-D stereoscopic differences, and a late sustained parietal amplitude modulation consistent with an 'old-new' memory advantage for real objects over images. Together, these findings demonstrate that real-world objects trigger stronger and more sustained action-related brain responses than images do. The results highlight important similarities and differences between brain responses to images and richer, more ecologically relevant, real-world objects.

Indexed as

AdultCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung AdultEEGImagesMu rhythmReal-world objects

Identifiers

PMID30776529
PMCPMC6536332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.