Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30776296›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019

Recombinant human granulocyte- colony stimulating factor in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy losses: a randomized clinical trial.

A Eapen, M Joing, P Kwon, J Tong, E Maneta, C De Santo, F Mussai, D Lissauer, D Carter, RESPONSE study group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02156063 (A Randomised, Double Blind, Multi-center, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of NT100 in Pregnant Women With a History of Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02156063 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomised, Double Blind, Multi-center, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of NT100 in Pregnant Women With a History of Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNora Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2014 to 2016Enrolled150ConditionsRecurrent Pregnancy Loss, Recurrent MiscarriageArmsNT100, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Australasian recurrent pregnancy loss clinical management guideline 2024, part II.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2024
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. G-CSF induces CD15Clinical & translational immunology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Supportive medication in cancer during pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

A EapenTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, UK.
M JoingNora Therapeutics, Inc., 530 Lytton Avenue, 2nd Floor, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
P KwonNora Therapeutics, Inc., 530 Lytton Avenue, 2nd Floor, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J TongNora Therapeutics, Inc., 530 Lytton Avenue, 2nd Floor, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
E ManetaTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, UK.
C De SantoTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, UK.
F MussaiTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, UK.
D LissauerTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, UK.
D CarterNora Therapeutics, Inc., 530 Lytton Avenue, 2nd Floor, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
RESPONSE study group
Miscarriage Association · GBNorthern Ohio Recovery Association · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBDerriford Hospital · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBHeartlands Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBThe University of Arizona Global Campus · USUniversity Hospital Coventry · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in the first trimester improve pregnancy outcomes, among women with a history of unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss? SUMMARY ANSWER: rhG-CSF administered in the first trimester of pregnancy did not improve outcomes among women with a history of unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The only previous randomized controlled study of granulocyte colony stimulating factor in recurrent miscarriage in 68 women with unexplained primary recurrent miscarriage found a statistically significant reduction in miscarriage and improvement in live birth rates. A further four observational studies where G-CSF was used in a recurrent miscarriage population were identified in the literature, two of which confirmed statistically significant increase in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial involving 150 women with a history of unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss was conducted at 21 sites with established recurrent miscarriage clinics in the United Kingdom between 23 June 2014 and 05 June 2016. The study was coordinated by University of Birmingham, UK. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsOne hundred and fifty women with a history of unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: 76 were randomized to rhG-CSF and 74 to placebo. Daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human granulocyte - colony stimulating factor 130 μg or identical appearing placebo from as early as three to five weeks of gestation for a maximum of 9 weeks. The trial used central randomization with allocation concealment. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy at 20 weeks of gestation, as demonstrated by an ultrasound scan. Secondary outcomes included miscarriages, livebirth, adverse events, stillbirth, neonatal birth weight, changes in clinical laboratory variables following study drug exposure, major congenital anomalies, preterm births and incidence of anti-drug antibody formation. Analysis was by intention to treat. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 340 participants were screened for eligibility of which 150 women were randomized. 76 women (median age, 32[IQR, 29-34] years; mean BMI, 26.3[SD, 4.2]) and 74 women (median age, 31[IQR, 26-33] years; mean BMI, 25.8[SD, 4.2]) were randomized to placebo. All women were followed-up to primary outcome, and beyond to live birth. The clinical pregnancy rate at 20 weeks, as well as the live birth rate, was 59.2% (45/76) in the rhG-CSF group, and 64.9% (48/74) in the placebo group, giving a relative risk of 0.9 (95% CI: 0.7-1.2; P = 0.48). There was no evidence of a significant difference between the groups for any of the secondary outcomes. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 52 (68.4%) participants in rhG-CSF group and 43 (58.1%) participants in the placebo group. Neonatal congenital anomalies were observed in 1/46 (2.1%) of babies in the rhG-CSF group versus 1/49 (2.0%) in the placebo group (RR of 0.9; 95% CI: 0.1-13.4; P = 0.93). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This trial was conducted in women diagnosed with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss and therefore no screening tests (commercially available) were performed for immune dysfunction related pregnancy failure/s. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsTo our knowledge, this is the first multicentre study and largest randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte human colony stimulating factor in women with recurrent miscarriages. Unlike the only available single center RCT, our trial showed no significant increase in clinical pregnancy or live births with the use of rhG-CSF in the first trimester of pregnancy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was sponsored and supported by Nora Therapeutics, Inc., 530 Lytton Avenue, 2nd Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94301, USA. Darryl Carter was the co-founder and VP of research, Nora Therapeutics, Inc. and held shares in the company. He holds a patent for the use of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor to reduce unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Mark Joing, Paul Kwon and Jeff Tong were or are employees of Nora Therapeutics, Inc. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUDRACT No: 2014-000084-40; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02156063. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31 Mar 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 23 Jun 2014.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualAdolescentAdultBirth RateDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RatePregnancy Trimester, FirstRecombinant ProteinsUnited KingdomYoung AdultGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorRecombinant Proteinscytokineimmune mediated miscarriagesneutropeniarecombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factorrecurrent pregnancy losssemi-allogenic fetusunexplained recurrent miscarriages

Identifiers

PMID30776296
PMCPMC6389865
OpenAlexW2916605622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.