ArticleEuropean oral research2018
Article in European oral research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Study and Relevance of Pulp Chamber Anatomy in Endodontics - A Comprehensive Review.European endodontic journal · 2024Review
- Crack growth pattern analysis of monolithic glass ceramic on a titanium abutment for single crown implant restorations using smooth particle hydrodynamics algorithm.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to determine the differences between the positional relationship of the crown contour and the pulp chamber of left and right maxillary first molars, as well as their morphological characteristics by using micro-CT system with reconstruction from a volumetric rendering software. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn total, 21 extracted maxillary first molars, including 11 left and 10 right teeth, were used. The positional relationship between the crown contour, pulp chamber and morphology of the teeth were investigated three-dimensionally by means of micro-CT imaging.
resultsClosest distance of mesio-buccal pulp horn to enamel surface in mm was calculated as 2.5±0.20 mm for right and 2.29±0.17 mm for left teeth. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.017). The means of closest distance of disto-buccal pulp horn to enamel surface were also significantly different between left and right teeth (p=0.001). The mean pulp volumes of right side and left side teeth were, respectively, 32.94±3.19 mm
conclusionThese results suggest that right and left maxillary first molars should be treated differently during preparation of cavities. Further studies must be done with larger samples as well as for other molar teeth in different populations to reveal the morphology of the molar for further considerations in restorative dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.