Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775454›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2017

Video can make behavioural science more reproducible.

Rick O Gilmore, Karen E Adolph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The mountain stream of infant development.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Practical Solutions for Sharing Data and Materials From Psychological Research.Advances in methods and practices in psychological science · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Oh, Behave!: PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS, XXth International Conference on Infant Studies New Orleans, LA, US May 2016.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rick O GilmoreDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA., rogilmore@psu.edu.
Karen E AdolphDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.

Funding

Databrary: An open video-based data-sharing system for developmental scienceU01HD076595 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD076595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recommend the widespread use of a simple, inexpensive, easy-to-implement, and uniquely powerful tool to improve the transparency and reproducibility of behavioural research - video recordings.

Identifiers

PMID30775454
PMCPMC6373476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.