Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775347›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental vaccine research2019

Rhoptry antigens as

Masoud Foroutan, Fatemeh Ghaffarifar, Zohreh Sharifi, Abdolhosein Dalimi, Ogholniaz Jorjani

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ROP64-DeficientMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recombinant SAG2A Protein fromMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Completing the pieces of a puzzle: in-depth probing ofClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024
    Article
  13. Construction and biological function ofZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. CD4Vaccines · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masoud ForoutanAbadan School of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-7217
Fatemeh GhaffarifarDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-8214
Zohreh SharifiBlood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6297-7659
Abdolhosein DalimiDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5591-5513
Ogholniaz JorjaniLaboratory Science Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Tarbiat Modares University · IRGolestan University · IRHigh Institute for Education and Research in Transfusion Medicine · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a cosmopolitan zoonotic infection, caused by a unicellular protozoan parasite known as

Indexed as

AdjuvantImmunizationMiceToxoplasma gondiiVaccines

Identifiers

PMID30775347
PMCPMC6369123
OpenAlexW2912835684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.