Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775259›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2019

Implementing online interventions in ICare: A biostatistical perspective.

Dennis Görlich, Andreas Faldum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dennis GörlichWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Schmeddingstraße 56, D-48149 Münster, Germany.
Andreas FaldumWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Schmeddingstraße 56, D-48149 Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of research studies is a highly complex process. All decisions with respect to the study design impact the statistical analyses and interpretation of the results. Within the ICare research project (EU H2020 Grant agreement 634757) seven research trials are conducted to generate evidence on efficacy, effectiveness and the dissemination potential of online interventions targeting eating disorders, common mental health problems and resilience. Within the project a central biometrical unit was established to manage and coordinate data collection, processing and statistical data analysis. This allows for harmonized trial planning, conduct, data management processes and analysis strategies. The purpose of this article is to describe the common concepts underlying all seven ICare trials. This includes development of (adaptive sequential) study designs, handling of missing values, general data management and processing as well as data protection aspects.

Indexed as

BiostatisticsData management and protectionRandomized controlled trialsStatistical analysisStudy designs

Identifiers

PMID30775259
PMCPMC6364454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.