Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775209›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2019

Pedicle Screws Loosening in Patients With Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: Potential Risk Factors and Relative Contribution.

Andrey Bokov, Anatoliy Bulkin, Alexander Aleynik, Marina Kutlaeva, Sergey Mlyavykh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04086784 (3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy Cages Versus PEEK Cages), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04086784 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy Cages Versus PEEK Cages: Pedicle Screw Loosening Rate and Fusion Rate in Patients With Osteoporosis

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking University Third HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled90ConditionsOsteoporosis, Degenerative Disc Disease, Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Degeneration Spine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pedicle Screw Loosening After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery and an Analytical Review of Recurrent Loosening: Based on Revision Surgery Experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. SBMC surgery · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Skeletal risk factors for postoperative complications in older men undergoing spinal fusion surgery.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrey BokovPrivolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Anatoliy BulkinPrivolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Alexander AleynikPrivolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Marina KutlaevaPrivolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Sergey MlyavykhPrivolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Privolzhsky Research Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

objectiveTo determine risk factors that may affect the rate of pedicle screws loosening in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

methodsA total of 250 patients with a low-grade spondylolisthesis and lumbar instability associated with degenerative diseases were enrolled. Preoperatively patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and cancellous bone radiodensity of a vertebral body was measured in Hounsfield units (HU). Pedicle screw fixation was used to treat patients either with a posterior fusion only or in combination with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and direct lateral interbody fusion (D-LIF). Minimal follow-up period accounted for 18 months. Cases with screw loosening were registered assessing association with risk factors using logistic regression.

resultsThe rate of screw loosening was in positive correlation with the number fused levels and decreasing bone radiodensity. Fusion with a greater load-bearing surface cage was associated with the decrease in rate of pedicle screws loosening. Incomplete reduction in case of spondylolisthesis, bilateral facet joints removal, and laminectomy performed without anterior support favored pedicle screws loosening development. The estimated model classifies correctly 79% of cases with the specificity and sensitivity accounting for 87% and 66% respectively.

conclusionsThe decreasing bone radiodensity in Hounsfield units has a considerable correlation with the rate of pedicle screws loosening. On the other hand, the length of fixation and applied surgical technique including fusion type also have a significant impact on complication rate. Spinal instrumentations should be planned by taking into account all potential risk factors and not characteristics relevant to bone quality assessment alone.

Indexed as

decompressiondegenerative diseasesHounsfield unitsinterbody fusionlumbar spinepedicle screws loosening

Identifiers

PMID30775209
PMCPMC6362557
OpenAlexW2804663518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.