Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775203›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2019

Software-Based Postoperative Communication With Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery.

Vadim Goz, Christopher Anthony, Andrew Pugely, Brandon Lawrence, Nicholas Spina, Darrel Brodke, William Ryan Spiker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mobile Application's Effect on Patient Satisfaction and Compliance in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Low Back Pain Versus Back-Related Leg Pain: How Do Patient Expectations and Outcomes of Lumbar Spine Surgery Compare?HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The Use of mHealth in Orthopedic Surgery: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vadim GozUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Christopher AnthonyUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Andrew PugelyUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Brandon LawrenceUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Nicholas SpinaUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Darrel BrodkeUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
William Ryan SpikerUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designObservational study.

objectivesPerioperative patient anxiety is a major concern in orthopedic surgery. Mobile messaging applications have been used in a number of healthcare settings. The goal of this project is to develop a novel mobile messaging application aimed at decreasing perioperative patient anxiety in spine surgery patients.

methodsPostoperative recovery journals were collected from patients undergoing spine surgery. Journals were used as a framework to develop a software-messaging library. A subsequent cohort of patients received daily text messages with educational material regarding their recovery for 14 days after discharge from their operative admission. Patients ranked the usefulness of the survey on day 14; further feedback was obtained via interviews.

resultsNineteen postoperative recovery journals were collected and analyzed. Content regarding postoperative recovery was compiled. The pilot group consisted of 21 patients. Average rating of the application on a 1 to 5 scale with 5 being "very useful" was 4.57. Of the 12 patients available for postoperative interviews, 11 felt the content of the messages was relevant. Nine of 12 patients felt the application made it less likely for them to call clinic.

conclusionsThe study presents a unique mobile phone messaging tool to offer patients support in the 2 weeks following spine surgery. The tool was felt to be useful by nearly all patients, had a high degree of patient engagement, and made the majority of patients less likely to call clinic.

Indexed as

messaging softwarepatient communicationpatient educationspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID30775203
PMCPMC6362547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.